Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Seeking impact and visibility: Scholar communication in Southern Africa [Mīkstie vāki]

  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 260 pages, height x width: 297x210 mm, weight: 685 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-Jun-2014
  • Izdevniecība: African Minds
  • ISBN-10: 1920677518
  • ISBN-13: 9781920677510
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 57,90 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 260 pages, height x width: 297x210 mm, weight: 685 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-Jun-2014
  • Izdevniecība: African Minds
  • ISBN-10: 1920677518
  • ISBN-13: 9781920677510
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
African scholarly research is relatively invisible globally because even though research production on the continent is growing in absolute terms, it is falling in comparative terms. In addition, traditional metrics of visibility, such as the Impact Factor, fail to make legible all African scholarly production. Many African universities also do not take a strategic approach to scholarly communication to broaden the reach of their scholars' work. To address this challenge, the Scholarly Communication in Africa Programme (SCAP) was established to help raise the visibility of African scholarship by mapping current research and communication practices in Southern African universities and by recommending and piloting technical and administrative innovations based on open access dissemination principles. To do this, SCAP conducted extensive research in four faculties at the Universities of Botswana, Cape Town, Mauritius and Namibia. SCAP found that scholars: carry heavy teaching and administrative loads which hinder their research productivity; remain unconvinced by open access dissemination; find it easier to collaborate with scholars in the global North than in the rest of Africa; rarely communicate their research with government; engage in small, locally-based research projects that are either unfunded or funded by their universities; produce outputs that are often interpretive, derivative or applied due, in part, to institutional rewards structures and funding challenges; do not utilise social media technologies to disseminate their work or seek new collaborative opportunities. Seeking Impact and Visibility shares the results of SCAP's research and advocacy efforts. It not only analyses these four universities' scholarly communication ecosystems, but illuminates the opportunities available for raising the visibility of their scholarship. It concludes with a series of recommendations that would enhance the communicative and developmental potential of African research. This study will be of interest for scholars of African higher education, academically-linked civil society organisations, educationally affiliated government personnel and university researchers and managers.
Tables and figures
v
Abbreviations viii
Project group xi
Acknowledgements xiii
Executive summary
1(236)
Chapter 1 Programme overview
9(10)
Scholarly in/visibility
11(3)
Open access for development
14(1)
Technology and capacity
15(1)
Project description
16(3)
Chapter 2 Project components and methodology
19(18)
Selection of pilot sites
19(2)
The principal investigation (PI) team
21(1)
Methodology
22(3)
Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT)
22(2)
CHAT principles
24(1)
Change laboratories
24(1)
Research components
25(1)
Expansive learning and change/advocacy
26(2)
Research strands
28(5)
Research and communication practice
28(2)
Values
30(2)
Impact
32(1)
Cost-benefit
33(1)
Implementation initiative
33(1)
Integration and analysis of data
34(1)
Conclusion
35(2)
Chapter 3 The Southern African university context
37(26)
Southern Africa
37(5)
History
38(1)
Demographics
38(1)
Funding
38(1)
Human capital
39(1)
Infrastructure
39(1)
Research
40(1)
Management
41(1)
University of Botswana
42(4)
History
42(1)
Demographics
42(1)
Funding
43(1)
Human capital
44(1)
Infrastructure
44(1)
Research
44(1)
Management
45(1)
University of Cape Town
46(5)
History
47(1)
Demographics
48(1)
Funding
49
Human capital
44(6)
Infrastructure
50(1)
Research
50(1)
Management
51(1)
University of Mauritius
51(5)
History
52(1)
Demographics
52(1)
Funding
52(1)
Human capital
53(1)
Infrastructure
53(1)
Research
54(1)
Management
55(1)
University of Namibia
56(5)
History
57(1)
Demographics
58(1)
Funding
58(1)
Human capital
59(1)
Infrastructure
59(1)
Research
60(1)
Management
61(1)
Conclusion
61(2)
Chapter 4 Scholarly communication policy landscape in Southern Africa
63(26)
The international context
63(5)
Open access goes mainstream
64(2)
Revised approaches to assessing impact
66(2)
The national context
68(8)
Botswana
69(1)
South Africa
70(3)
Mauritius
73(2)
Namibia
75(1)
The institutional context
76(10)
University of Botswana
76(3)
University of Cape Town
79(1)
University of Mauritius
80(2)
University of Namibia
82(4)
Analysis
86(3)
Chapter 5 Research and communication practices
89(52)
Faculty profiles
90(3)
Positions
91(1)
Salary scales
92(1)
Time spent on teaching, research and administration
93(1)
Values
94(12)
Open access
103(3)
Research and dissemination cycle
106(23)
Conceptualisation
106(5)
Data collection and analysis
111(3)
Articulation of findings
114(12)
Translation and engagement
126(3)
Rewards and incentives
129(9)
Do these reward and incentive systems achieve their goals?
136(2)
Conclusion
138(3)
Chapter 6 The SCAP implementation initiative
141(36)
UB Department of Library and Information Studies
142(7)
Challenges
142(2)
Implementation focus
144(2)
Implementing the initiative
146(2)
Lessons learned
148(1)
UCT Southern African Labour and Development Research Unit
149(7)
Challenges
150(1)
Implementation focus
151(1)
Intervention: OpenSALDRU
152(2)
Intervention: Round-table policy forum
154(1)
Intervention: Internal communication tools
155(1)
Lessons learned
155(1)
UoM Faculty of Science
156(10)
Challenges
156(5)
Implementation focus
161(1)
The Profiling Academics Online (PAO) initiative
162(2)
Implementation initiative results
164(1)
Lessons learned
165(1)
UNAM Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
166(9)
Challenges
166(2)
Implementation focus
168(1)
Intervention
168(6)
Lessons learned
174(1)
Conclusion
175(2)
Chapter 7 Challenges, contradictions and opportunities
177(44)
Challenges
177(14)
Institutional culture
178(2)
Research culture
180(3)
Funding
183(2)
Time
185(1)
e-Infrastructure
186(1)
Skills and capacity
187(1)
African marginalisation
188(3)
Contradictions
191(13)
Articulation vs implementation
191(2)
Open vs closed communication
193(2)
Teaching vs administration vs research vs practice
195(4)
Quantity vs quality
199(1)
Prestige vs relevance
200(2)
Scholar-to-scholar vs scholar-to-community/government communication
202(2)
Opportunities
204(15)
Institutional culture
204(3)
Research infrastructure
207(1)
Rewards and incentives
208(2)
Open access
210(2)
Gateway status
212(1)
The virtuous funding cycle
213(1)
Innovation-focused intermediaries
214(1)
e-Infrastructure
215(2)
Quality assurance
217(2)
Conclusion
219(2)
Chapter 8 Key findings
221(12)
Research and communication practices
222(6)
Values
222(1)
Research production
223(1)
Outputs
224(1)
Communication
225(1)
Networks and collaboration
226(1)
Research culture
227(1)
Policy
228(2)
Institutional culture
228(1)
Open access
229(1)
Infrastructure and capacity
230(3)
Capacity
230(1)
Research infrastructure
231(2)
Chapter 9 Recommendations
233(4)
To national governments
233(1)
To university administrations
234(1)
To university scholars
235(1)
To research funding agencies
235(2)
References 237