Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Selfless Intervention: The Exercise of Jurisdiction in the Common Interest

(Professor of Public International Law, Utrecht University)
  • Formāts: 272 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 19-Jun-2020
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780192592712
  • Formāts - EPUB+DRM
  • Cena: 96,43 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: 272 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 19-Jun-2020
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780192592712

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Should states intervene in situations outside of their own territory in order to safeguard or promote the common good? In this book, Cedric Ryngaert addresses this key question, looking at how the international law of state jurisdiction can be harnessed to serve interests common to the international community. The author inquires how the purpose of the law of jurisdiction may shift from protecting national interests to furthering international concerns, such as those relating to the global environment and human rights. Such a shift is enabled by the instability of the notion of jurisdiction, as well as the interpretative ambiguity of the related notions of sovereignty and territoriality. There is no denying that, in the real world, 'selfless intervention' by states tends to combine with more insular considerations. This book argues, however, that such considerations do not necessarily detract from the legitimacy of unilateralism, but may precisely serve to trigger the exercise of jurisdiction in the common interest.
Table of Cases
xiii
Table of Legislation
xix
List of Abbreviations
xxv
1 International Law and Cosmopolitanism
1(16)
1.1 On Cosmopolitanism and Realism
2(5)
1.2 From Multilateral to Unilateral Cosmopolitanism
7(2)
1.3 Techniques of Extraterritoriality: Private Regulation Versus State Unilateralism
9(4)
1.4 Methodology
13(3)
1.5 Structure
16(1)
2 Selfless Intervention: The Promise of Unilateral Jurisdiction
17(47)
2.1 Unilateral Action C ompensating for Multilateral Failures
19(6)
2.2 The `International Community' Served by Unilateral Action
25(10)
2.2.1 Erga omnes obligations
29(3)
2.2.2 Global public goods and global problems
32(3)
2.3 The Cosmopolitan State as a Benevolent Hegemon
35(11)
2.4 Reinterpreting Sovereignty
46(5)
2.5 Reinterpreting State Consent: Beyond Formalism
51(6)
2.6 Positive Law Authorizations and Obligations to Exercise Jurisdiction in the Common Interest
57(4)
2.7 Concluding Observations
61(3)
3 Selfless Jurisdiction and the National Interest: Between Cosmopolitanism and Parochialism
64(28)
3.1 Allocating the Exercise of Jurisdiction
65(6)
3.2 Cosmopolitan Jurisdiction and the National Interest
71(13)
3.2.1 Universal criminal jurisdiction: public prosecutors and the national interest
74(4)
3.2.2 Jurisdiction and transnational business regulation
78(6)
3.3 Independent Courts and the National Interest
84(6)
3.4 Concluding Observations
90(2)
4 Limitations to the Exercise of Prescriptive Jurisdiction in the Common Interest
92(46)
4.1 Reasonableness
97(4)
4.2 International Recognition of Common Interests
101(8)
4.3 Democratic Participation
109(16)
4.3.1 Foundations and principles of participation
109(8)
4.3.2 The reality of participation
117(6)
4.3.3 Participation in dispute settlement
123(2)
4.3.4 Concluding observations
125(1)
4.4 Equivalence
125(5)
4.5 Transfers
130(6)
4.6 Concluding Observations
136(2)
5 The Selfless Exercise of Jurisdiction to Protect Human Rights and the Environment
138(71)
5.1 Introduction
138(7)
5.1.1 The jurisdictional capabilities of territoriality
139(3)
5.1.2 Scope and focus of the specific part
142(2)
5.1.3 Structure
144(1)
5.2 Port State Jurisdiction regarding IUU Fishing and Vessel-Source Pollution
145(17)
5.2.1 Residual port state powers and denial of entry
148(2)
5.2.2 Port state jurisdiction over territorial offences
150(3)
5.2.3 A novel jurisdictional ground for port state measures in the common interest?
153(2)
5.2.4 Port state jurisdiction as parochial cosmopolitanism
155(1)
5.2.5 Port state jurisdiction between unilateralism and multilateralism
156(4)
5.2.6 Reasonableness
160(2)
5.2.7 Concluding observations
162(1)
5.3 Unilateral Trade Measures regarding Global Environmental Challenges
162(11)
5.3.1 Trade and the environment: the WTO approach
164(2)
5.3.2 Trade law and jurisdictional nexus
166(2)
5.3.3 Jurisdictional reasonableness and the GATT
168(5)
5.3.4 Concluding observations
173(1)
5.4 The Right to a Remedy in Tort in Transnational Business and Human Rights Litigation
173(17)
5.4.1 Domicile and connected claims
177(3)
5.4.2 Forum of necessity
180(2)
5.4.3 Universal civil jurisdiction
182(2)
5.4.4 Other jurisdictional grounds
184(1)
5.4.5 Sovereignty concerns and reasonableness
185(4)
5.4.6 Concluding observations
189(1)
5.5 Extraterritoriality in the Internet Era--The Case of Data Protection
190(19)
5.5.1 Data protection as an emerging global value
194(4)
5.5.2 The (extra-)territorialityof EU data protection legislation
198(2)
5.5.3 Extraterritorial obligations
200(1)
5.5.4 Data protection extraterritoriality and international conflict
201(2)
5.5.5 Reasonableness
203(5)
5.5.6 Concluding observations
208(1)
6 Concluding Observations
209(14)
6.1 Cosmopolitanism and the State
209(1)
6.2 Selfless Intervention, Jurisdiction, and State Sovereignty
210(1)
6.3 The Capaciousness of Territoriality
211(2)
6.4 Territoriality and the Common Interest
213(6)
6.5 Limitations
219(1)
6.6 Selfless Intervention and the National Interest
219(1)
6.7 Unilateralism as Global Governance
220(3)
Index 223
Cedric Ryngaert is Professor of Public International Law and Head of the Department of International and European Law at Utrecht University. He is also the programme leader of the LLM in Public International Law at Utrecht University. He studied law at Leuven University and obtained his PhD from Leuven in 2007. He is the author of, among other publications, Jurisdiction in International Law (OUP 2015, 2nd ed).