Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Sentencing Law and Policy: Cases, Statutes, and Guidelines [ Connected Ebook] 5th ed. [Hardback]

  • Formāts: Hardback, 632 pages, height x width: 254x187 mm, weight: 1202 g
  • Sērija : Aspen Casebook
  • Izdošanas datums: 31-Jan-2022
  • Izdevniecība: Aspen Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1543847447
  • ISBN-13: 9781543847444
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 379,65 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 632 pages, height x width: 254x187 mm, weight: 1202 g
  • Sērija : Aspen Casebook
  • Izdošanas datums: 31-Jan-2022
  • Izdevniecība: Aspen Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1543847447
  • ISBN-13: 9781543847444
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
"Casebook on the law of sentencing for law students"--

Sentencing Law and Policy: Cases, Statutes, and Guidelines, Fifth Edition, provides comprehensive coverage of all aspects of sentencing law, policy and practice.

The new fifth edition of Sentencing Law & Policy: Cases Statutes and Guidelines gives students a comprehensive overview of modern sentencing practices in all major types of systems: determinate and indeterminate, discretionary, and structured, federal and state, capital and non-capital. Authored by leading scholars in the fields of sentencing and criminal procedure, this casebook surveys the legal doctrine and depicts major sentencing institutions at work, including legislatures, commissions, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, probation officers, parole boards, and others. The book motivates students to connect legal practices with current policy and equity debates that reshape criminal sentencing. The new edition includes extensive materials on emerging topics like the work of progressive prosecutors, the use of risk assessment tools, and the impacts of the COVID pandemic.

New to the Fifth Edition:

  • Thoroughly updated to address important statutory and case law changes, including important new legislation, such as the FIRST STEP Act, leading U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals, state appellate court decisions, and prominent recent scholarship.
  • Coverage of modern policy issues, including mass incarceration, prosecutorial and judicial discretion, punishment for drug crimes, revised federal and state sentencing guidelines, and concerns about racial and other disparities in sentencing.
  • Additions give focused attention to new topics of particular interest to sentencing advocates and practitioners such as the policies of progressive prosecutors, the development and use of risk assessment tools at sentencing, and the impacts of the COVID pandemic on sentencing and corrections. A new final chapter considers sentencing review doctrines and pays special attention to new laws and advocacy surrounding “second look” sentencing mechanisms. It also questions the role of executive clemency in the criminal system.

Professors and students will benefit from:

  • Intuitive organization that tracks the progression of every criminal case but is modular enough to allow professors to organize the material as they see fit.
  • Comprehensive examples drawn from all common sentencing regimes, including guideline-determinate, indeterminate, and capital schemes.
  • Notes, problems, and questions address current issues of concern, provide comprehensive policy discussion, and integrate with direct sources of information, including sentencing commission websites.
  • Wide-ranging source materials, including:
    • S. Supreme Court decisions
    • State high court rulings, federal appellate court cases, and rulings from foreign jurisdictions
    • Federal and state statutes and sentencing guidelines
    • Reports and statistical data from various jurisdictions
  • Up-to-date and robust coverage of cutting-edge topics ranging from the new federal FIRST STEP Act to the local progressive prosecutor movement, from the impact of the COVID pandemic to the emergence of new “second look” sentencing mechanisms.
  • Discussions of race, gender, and class run throughout the entire book and challenge students to confront questions about warranted and unwarranted disparities.

Teaching materials include:

  • Online Teachers’ Manual
  • Sample syllabi
  • Classroom Exercises
  • Online readings, drawn from prior editions, to cover topics that some teachers might want to explore in greater detail than the published text envisions
Preface xxi
Acknowledgments xxvii
Chapter 1 The Purposes of Punishment and Sentencing 1(80)
A Social Purposes of Sentencing
2(40)
1 Stated Purposes
3(26)
a Purposes Statutes
3(17)
ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, Sentencing 18-2.1
3(2)
18 United States Code §3553
5(1)
Tennessee Code §40-35-102
6(1)
Notes
7(6)
Problem 1-1. Richard Graves
13(1)
Montana Code Annotated §46-18-101
14(1)
Notes
15(5)
b Community Purposes
20(9)
A Healing Circle in the Innu Community of Sheshashit
22(5)
Notes
27(2)
Problem 1-2. Red Hook Community Court
29(1)
2 Implicit Purposes
29(13)
Michael Tonry, Purposes and Functions of Sentencing
29(3)
Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
32(6)
Notes
38(4)
B Purposes in Practical Context
42(39)
1 Use of Purposes in Sentencing an Individual Offender
42(14)
The Queen v. Robert James Arnautovic
43(7)
United States v. Jamie Leann Beam
50(3)
Notes
53(2)
Problem 1-3. Bromley Heath
55(1)
2 Use of Purposes in System Components
56(7)
Simplification Paper: Criminal History
56(4)
Notes
60(3)
3 Politics, Philosophy, and Economics
63(20)
a Equality/Disparity Concerns
63(3)
ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, Sentencing 18-2.5
64(1)
Notes
65(1)
b Cents and Sentencing Ability
66(5)
The Conservative Case for Reform
66(3)
Notes
69(2)
Problem
14. Sentencing Without Prison or Death
71(1)
Problem 1-5. Sentencing Budgets
71(1)
c Public Sentiment
71(13)
Karen Gelb, Myths and Misconceptions: Public Opinion versus Public Judgment About Sentencing
71(7)
Notes
78(1)
Problem 1-6. Crime in America
79(2)
Chapter 2 Who Sentences? 81(50)
A Sentencing in the Courtroom
83(14)
1 Judges in Indeterminate Sentencing
84(5)
Samuel Williams v. New York
84(3)
Notes
87(1)
Problem 2-1. Determining the Indeterminable
88(1)
2 Parole Boards in Indeterminate Sentencing
89(4)
The Parole Process in Georgia
89(1)
Parole Consideration, Eligibility, and Guidelines
90(1)
Problem 2-2. Savings Plan
91(1)
Notes
91(2)
3 Sentencing Juries
93(4)
Arkansas Code §16-97-101, Bifurcated Sentencing Procedures
93(1)
Arkansas Code §16-97-103, Evidence
94(1)
Arkansas Code §16-90-107, Fixing of Punishment Generally
95(1)
Notes
95(2)
B Legislatures and Commissions
97(16)
1 Mandatory Minimum Sentences
97(8)
Code of Hammurabi
97(1)
Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System
98(6)
Notes
104(1)
2 Sentencing Commissions and Guidelines
105(8)
ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, Sentencing 18-4.1
107(1)
Kevin Reitz, Modeling Discretion in American Sentencing Systems
108(3)
Notes
111(2)
C Prosecutors
113(10)
People v. Wayne Robert Stewart
113(3)
Ronald Wright & Marc Miller, The Screening/Bargaining Tradeoff
116(3)
Office of the District Attorney, City of Philadelphia, New Policies Announced February 15, 2018
119(3)
Notes
122(1)
D Appellate Court Guidance
123(8)
R. v. Edward Bilinski
126(2)
Notes
128(3)
Chapter 3 Regulating Discretion 131(84)
A Origins of Sentencing Guideline Structures
131(9)
Marvin E. Frankel, Criminal Sentences: Law Without Order
132(4)
Notes
136(4)
B Development and Structure of State Guideline Systems
140(16)
Dale Parent, Structuring Criminal Sentencing
142(3)
Notes
145(2)
Problem 3-1. The Minnesota Guidelines in a High-Profile Case
147(3)
Richard S. Frase, Sentencing Guidelines in American Courts: A Forty-Year Retrospective
150(4)
Notes
154(2)
C Structure of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines
156(16)
Federal Sentencing Guidelines Manual,
Chapter One-Introduction, Authority, and General Application Principles
158(4)
Notes
162(1)
Federal Sentencing: The Basics
163(6)
Notes
169(3)
D Departures and Discretion Under the Federal Guidelines
172(6)
Linda Drazga Maxfield & John H. Kramer, Substantial Assistance: An Empirical Yardstick Gauging Equity in Current Federal Policy and Practice
173(2)
Notes
175(3)
E Advisory Guidelines: The Aftermath of Booker
178(28)
United States v. Freddie j Booker
179(10)
Notes
189(3)
Derrick Kimbrough v. United States
192(11)
Notes
203(3)
F Departures and Variances in Federal Practice
206(9)
U.S. Sentencing Commission, The Influence of the Guidelines on Federal Sentencing Outcomes: National Sentencing Practices from 2005-2017
208(2)
Notes
210(2)
Problem 3-2. New Constitutional Guidelines
212(3)
Chapter 4 Sentencing Inputs: The Crime and Its Effects 215(74)
Problem 4-1. Rob Anon
215(1)
A Which Crime?
216(26)
1 Real Offense versus Conviction Offense
216(14)
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual
218(1)
United States v. Vernon Watts
219(4)
Charles Frederick Barr v. State
223(1)
Notes
224(5)
Problem 4-2. Rob Anon Revisited
229(1)
2 Multiple Convictions
230(6)
Problem 4-3. Take Two
231(1)
North Carolina General Statutes §15A-1340.15
231(1)
Kansas Statutes §21-6819
231(1)
Problem 4-4. Predisposed to Prison
232(1)
Notes
233(3)
3 Role in a Group Offense
236(6)
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual
236(1)
United States v. Donald Carpenter
237(3)
Notes
240(1)
Problem 4-5. Rob Anon Revisited
241(1)
B Assessing Offense Seriousness
242(37)
U.S. Senate Report No. 98-225
242(1)
Notes
243(1)
1 Qualitative Assessments of Harm
244(19)
Ehrlich Anthony Coker v. Georgia
245(3)
Notes
248(1)
Patrick Kennedy v. Louisiana
249(8)
Notes
257(2)
State v. Stanley Royster
259(1)
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual
260(1)
Notes
261(2)
Problem 4-6. Rob Anon Revisited
263(1)
2 Quantitative Assessments of Harm
263(8)
Richard Chapman v. United States
263(4)
Notes
267(4)
Problem 4-7. Getting Tough on Drunk Drivers
271(1)
3 The Role of Mens Rea and Motive
271(8)
a Strict Liability Sentencing Factors
271(4)
United States v. Ana Marin de Velasquez
272(2)
Notes
274(1)
b Hate Crimes and the Relevance of Motive
275(16)
Wisconsin v. Todd Mitchell
275(2)
Notes
277(2)
Problem 4-8. Rob Anon (aka Jean Valjean?) Revisited
279(1)
C The Role of Victims and the Community
279(10)
State v. Rasheed Muhammad
280(5)
Notes
285(4)
Chapter 5 Sentencing Inputs: The Defendant's Record and Background 289(92)
Problem 5-1. Rob Anon
289(1)
A Prior Criminal Record
290(27)
1 "Strikes" Laws and Other Mandatory Rules
291(8)
People v. Jerry Garcia
291(7)
Notes
298(1)
2 Complicated Criminal Records
299(6)
United States v. Antonio Robertson
299(4)
Notes
303(2)
3 "Violent Crime" Recidivist Enhancements
305(6)
Samuel Johnson v. United States
306(4)
Notes
310(1)
4 The First-Time Offender
311(6)
Washington Revised Code §9.94A.650
311(1)
State v. Joshua Fowler
312(3)
Notes
315(2)
B The Cooperative Defendant
317(14)
1 Acceptance of Responsibility and Plea Bargains
318(7)
State v. David Tiernan
318(3)
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual
321(1)
Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act
322(1)
Notes
322(3)
2 Substantial Assistance
325(6)
United States v. Amanda Williams
326(1)
Nevada Revised Statutes §453.3405(2)
327(1)
Problem 5-2. Helping Others
327(1)
Problem 5-3. Earned Time
328(1)
Notes
329(2)
C The Defendant's Background and Circumstances
331(39)
Problem 5-4. Turning Guidance into Guidelines
331(1)
Notes
332(2)
1 Immutable Characteristics
334(15)
ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, Sentencing 18-3.4(d)
334(1)
Evan Miller v. Alabama
335(10)
Notes
345(4)
2 Circumstances Within the Defendant's Control
349(10)
Brian Michael Gall v. United States
349(6)
Problem 5-5. Treatment and Timing
355(1)
Problem 5-6. Restitution and Rehabilitation
356(1)
Notes
357(2)
3 Social Context of the Defendant
359(11)
United States v. Fadya Husein
359(7)
Notes
366(2)
Problem 5-7. Pillar of the Community
368(1)
Notes
369(1)
D The Persistent Effects of the Defendant's Race
370(11)
William J. Sabol, Thaddeus L. Johnson & Alexander Caccavale, Trends in Correctional Control by Race and Sex
370(5)
Notes
375(2)
Problem 5.
.8
The Crack-Powder Differential
377(1)
Notes
378(3)
Chapter 6 Procedure and Proof at Sentencing 381(50)
A Formal Trial, Informal Sentencing
381(19)
Dynel McMillan v. Pennsylvania
384(3)
Notes
387(4)
State v. Eric Loomis
391(8)
Notes
399(1)
B The Resurgent Jury Trial Right
400(18)
Ralph Blakely, Jr. v. Washington
401(9)
Notes
410(3)
Problem 6-1. Moving Violations 390
413(1)
Problem 6-2. The Capital Jury
414(1)
Notes
415(3)
C Rebuilding Guideline Procedures
418(13)
State v. Abdul Abdullah
418(5)
Problem 6-3. Prior Juvenile Adjudications
423(1)
Notes
424(7)
Chapter 7 Sentencing Outcomes: The Scale of Imprisonment 431(70)
A Incarceration Trends
431(10)
1 The Prison as an American Innovation
431(5)
Norval Morris, The Future of Imprisonment
432(2)
Notes
434(2)
2 Prison Growth
436(5)
Notes
437(4)
B Competing Explanations for Growth
441(18)
1 Crime Control and Social Conditions
441(14)
The Growth of Incarceration Rates in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences
442(7)
Notes
449(6)
2 Constraining Influences
455(4)
North Carolina General Statutes §120-36.7(d)
456(1)
Kansas Statutes §74-9101(b)
456(1)
Notes
457(2)
C The Human Experience of Prison
459(11)
Norval Morris, The Contemporary Prison, 1965-Present
459(3)
Notes
462(8)
D Limiting Imprisonment Under the Eighth Amendment
470(20)
Problem 7-1. Lookout
471(1)
Problem 7-2. Family Business
472(1)
Problem 7-3. Enough Is Enough
473(1)
Notes
473(3)
Terrance Jamar Graham v. Florida
476(11)
Notes
487(3)
E Reconsidering Mass Incarceration
490(11)
Don Stemen, The Prison Paradox: More Incarceration Will Not Make Us Safer
491(4)
Chris Mai & Ram Subramanian, The Price of Prisons: Examining State Spending Trends, 2010-2015
495(2)
Notes
497(4)
Chapter 8 Sentences Reconsidered 501(86)
A Judicial Reconsideration of Sentences
501(28)
1 Sentencing Judge at Initial Hearing
502(6)
California v. Superior Court of San Diego County (Jesus Romero, Real Party in Interest)
502(4)
Notes
506(2)
2 Direct Appeal of Sentences
508(8)
42 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes §9781
509(1)
Problem 8-1. How Appealing?
509(1)
Problem 8-2. Waiving Good-bye to an Appeal?
510(1)
Notes
511(5)
3 Second-Look Sentencing by Judges
516(13)
18 U.S.C. §3582
518(1)
Notes
519(2)
United States v. Thomas McCoy
521(5)
Notes
526(3)
Problem 8-3. Second Thoughts About Second Looks?
529(1)
B Executive Reconsideration of Sentences
529(58)
1 Parole
530(20)
a Parole Commissions and Guidelines
531(10)
Iowa Code §§904A.1, 904A.2
532(1)
Colorado Revised Statutes §17-22.5-404
532(2)
Michael McDermott v. James McDonald
534(4)
Notes
538(3)
b Parole Conditions
541(4)
Alaska Statutes §33.16.150
541(2)
Colorado Revised Statutes §16-11.7-105(2)
543(1)
Problem 8-4. Banishment
543(1)
Problem 8-5. Computer Condition
543(1)
Notes
544(1)
c Parole Revocation
545(8)
People v. Andras Peter Schaffer
546(3)
Notes
549(1)
2 Prosecutorial Reconsideration
550(3)
3 Pardons, Commutations, Clemencies, and Amnesties
553(34)
U.S. Constitution Art. II, §2, Cl.
554(1)
Alabama Constitution Art. V, §124
554(1)
Washington Revised Code §9.94A.728
554(1)
Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Eugene Woodard
554(4)
Notes
558(5)
Remarks of Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole at the Press Conference Announcing the Clemency Initiative
563(2)
Notes
565(6)
Table of Cases
571(10)
Table of Statutes, Rules, and Guidelines
581(6)
Index 587