Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Shelley's Poetics of Reticence: Shelley's Shame

  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 50,08 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Through new readings of Shelley’s verse, this book engages with the affective, phenomenological and ethical dimensions of shame, as it is made manifest by Shelley’s textual strategies of reticence.



Exploring the rhetorical and phenomenological links between shame and reticence, this book examines the psychology of Shelley’s anguished poet-Subject. Shelley’s struggles with the fragility of the ‘self’ have largely been seen as the result of thinking which connects emotional hyperstimulation to moral and political undermining of the individual ‘will’. This work takes a different approach, suggesting that Shelley’s insecurities stemmed from anxieties about the nature of aesthetic self-representation. Shame is an appropriate affective marker of such anxiety because it occurs at the cusp between internal and external self-evaluation. Shelley’s reticent poetics transfers an affective sense of shame to the reader and provokes interpretive responsibility. Paying attention to the affective contours of texts, this book presents new readings of Shelley’s major works. These interpretations show that awakening the reader’s ethical discretion creates a constructive dynamic which challenges influential deconstructive readings of the unfinished nature of Shelley’s work and thought.

Introduction

i Shelleys Shames

ii Shame Theories

iii Reticence

iv Affect and Romanticism

v Texts

Chapter One: Reticent Impersonations: Shelleys Unhappy Consciousness

i The Empty Subject

ii Bad Faith

iii Shame and Ideology

iv Historicism

v The Problems of Materialism

Chapter Two: Alastors Mute Poets

i Shelley and Wordsworth

ii Rejecting natural piety

iii The veilčd maid and the disgrace of the alternative

iv The narrator as victim of his own constructions

Chapter Three: Shame, Silence and Historicism in The Cenci

i Beatrices Casuistry

ii Shame and De-humanisation

iii Shame as Self-construction

Chapter Four: Julian and Maddalo: What the cold world shall not know

i The Reticence of the cold world and Shelleys Critique of Symbols

ii The Maniacs Resistance and Byrons Prometheus

iii The Maniacs Performance of Shame

iv Julians Reserve

Chapter Five: Metaphysical Sympathies

i Sympathetic Poetics in A Defence of Poetry

ii Transcending the Ego in Ode to the West Wind, Mont Blanc, Ode to
Intellectual Beauty and Adonais

Chapter Six: The Jane Poems: Love, Lyric and Life

i Eroticism and the hollowness of the "Lyric I"

ii Sensory Bad faith

iii Beyond Denial

Chapter Seven: The Triumph of Life: Pleasure versus process and the shame of
self-knowledge

i The Failure of Allegory

ii Rousseau as the Subject-in-Shame

iii Countering the cold glare

Conclusion
Merrilees Roberts is a teaching associate at Queen Mary, University of London, where she teaches mainly literary theory. She also completed her doctoral work on Percy Shelley at Queen Mary, examining reticence in Percy Shelleys poetry and philosophy.