Preface |
|
vii | |
About the Editors |
|
xi | |
About the Authors |
|
xiii | |
External Reviewers |
|
xix | |
Acronyms and Abbreviations |
|
xxi | |
Unit Conversion Table |
|
xxv | |
Glossary |
|
xxvii | |
|
In Situ Bioremediation of Perchlorate in Groundwater: An Overview |
|
|
1 | (14) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
How Did Perchlorate Become Such a Problem? |
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
Perchlorate Properties and Behavior in the Subsurface |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Evolution of Analytical Capabilities |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Evolution of Toxicological Understanding |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
How Can In Situ Bioremediation Help Solve the Perchlorate Problem? |
|
|
7 | (8) |
|
Treatment Technology Overview |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
Why Use In Situ Bioremediation? |
|
|
9 | (6) |
|
Development of in Situ Bioremediation Technologies for Perchlorate |
|
|
15 | (14) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Analytical Methods and Pilot Programs |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Ubiquitous Occurrence of Perchlorate Degraders |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Bioremediation Strategies |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
Remediation of Perchlorate in Soil---The New Challenge |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
|
24 | (5) |
|
Principles of Perchlorate Treatment |
|
|
29 | (26) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
Abiotic Remediation Processes |
|
|
29 | (5) |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
Abiotic Reduction Technologies |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
Overview of Abiotic Processes |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Biological Remediation Processes |
|
|
34 | (5) |
|
General Characteristics of DPRB |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
Environmental Factors Controlling DPRB Activity |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Challenges Associated with Microbial Perchlorate Reduction |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
Biofouling and Electron Donor Selection |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
The Tools Available for Predicting and Monitoring Microbial Perchlorate Reduction |
|
|
42 | (4) |
|
Most Probable Number Counts |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Probes to Specific Groups of Perchlorate-Reducing Organisms |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
Immunoprobes Specific for DPRB |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
Use of Stable Isotopes to Identify Perchlorate Source and Monitor Degradation |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
Enrichment, Isolation, and Maintenance of DPRB |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (6) |
|
Appendix 3.1 Medium for Freshwater Perchlorate-Reducing Microorganisms |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
Perchlorate Sources, Source Identification and Analytical Methods |
|
|
55 | (24) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (7) |
|
|
56 | (4) |
|
Natural Sources of Perchlorate |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
Distinguishing Synthetic from Natural Perchlorate Using Stable Isotope Analysis |
|
|
62 | (6) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
Stable Isotope Methods for Perchlorate |
|
|
63 | (5) |
|
Analytical Methods for Perchlorate Analysis |
|
|
68 | (5) |
|
DoD-Approved Analytical Methods |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
Other Analytical Methods for Perchlorate |
|
|
70 | (3) |
|
Site Characterization for Perchlorate Treatment |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (5) |
|
Alternatives for in Situ Bioremediation of Perchlorate |
|
|
79 | (12) |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
Technology Selection Process |
|
|
81 | (4) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (2) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (3) |
|
Ability to Meet Management Objectives |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
Problematic Site Conditions |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
|
91 | (44) |
|
Background and General Approach |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
When to Consider an Active Treatment System |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Treatment System Configurations |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
Groundwater Extraction and Reinjection (ER) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
Horizontal Flow Treatment Wells (HFTWs) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (5) |
|
|
95 | (3) |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
System Design, Operation and Monitoring |
|
|
100 | (13) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (4) |
|
|
105 | (3) |
|
|
108 | (3) |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
Case Study: Aerojet Area 20 Groundwater Extraction - Reinjection System |
|
|
113 | (18) |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
Site Geology and Hydrogeology |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
PTA Installation, Instrumentation and Operation |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
Baseline Geochemical Characterization |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
Hydraulic Characterization (Tracer Testing) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (6) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
131 | (4) |
|
Semi-Passive in Situ Bioremediation |
|
|
135 | (20) |
|
|
135 | (4) |
|
What is a Semi-Passive Approach? |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
When to Consider a Semi-Passive Approach |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Advantages and Limitations Relative to Other Approaches |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
System Design, Operation, and Monitoring |
|
|
139 | (5) |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Operation and Maintenance |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
Case Study: Semi-Passive Bioremediation of Perchlorate at the Longhorn Army Ammunitions Plant |
|
|
144 | (9) |
|
Demonstration Test Procedures |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
Demonstration Test Results |
|
|
147 | (5) |
|
Conclusions of Case Study |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
Passive Bioremediation of Perchlorate Using Emulsified Edible Oils |
|
|
155 | (22) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
Design of Passive Bioremediation Systems |
|
|
156 | (10) |
|
Treatment System Configurations |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
Planning and Design of Passive Bioremediation Systems |
|
|
158 | (5) |
|
Site Characterization Requirements |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
|
166 | (5) |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
Factors Controlling Cost and Performance |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (5) |
|
Permeable Organic Biowalls for Remediation of Perchlorate in Groundwater |
|
|
177 | (22) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
Land Use and Infrastructure |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
Contaminant Concentration and Distribution |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Design of Permeable Biowalls |
|
|
181 | (4) |
|
Site-Specific Hydrogeology and Contaminant Distribution |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
Dimensions, Configuration and Residence Time |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
Recharge Options and Alternative Configurations |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Biowall Installation and Construction |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
Quality Assurance/Quality Control |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
Sustaining the Reaction Zone |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
|
189 | (2) |
|
Installation and Trenching Costs |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
Operations and Monitoring Costs |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
Summary of Life Cycle Costs |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
Case Study: Former NWIRP McGregor, McGregor, Texas |
|
|
191 | (6) |
|
Fast Track Cleanup and Innovative Technology Implementation |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
Ex Situ Groundwater Treatment |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
In Situ Groundwater Treatment |
|
|
192 | (3) |
|
Natural Attenuation in Groundwater |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
Operations and Maintenance |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
Cost Analysis of in Situ Perchlorate Bioremediation Technologies |
|
|
199 | (20) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
Template Site Characteristics and Variations Considered |
|
|
202 | (4) |
|
Cost Estimates for Base Case Site Characteristics |
|
|
206 | (5) |
|
Impacts of Changes In Site Characteristics on Costs |
|
|
211 | (4) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Reduced and Elevated Concentrations of Perchlorate |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
Lower and Higher Electron Acceptor Concentrations |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
Low and High Groundwater Seepage Velocities |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
Thin and Thick Saturated Vertical Intervals |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (4) |
|
Emerging Technologies for Perchlorate Bioremediation |
|
|
219 | (26) |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
Monitored Natural Attenuation |
|
|
219 | (5) |
|
|
219 | (3) |
|
Advantages and Limitations |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
|
224 | (5) |
|
|
224 | (3) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Advantages and Limitations |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
Vadose Zone Bioremediation |
|
|
229 | (16) |
|
|
231 | (2) |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
Advantages and Limitations |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
|
234 | (11) |
Index |
|
245 | |