|
|
xiii | |
|
|
xv | |
|
PART I LOCAL PARTY ORGANIZATIONS AND THE ELECTORAL LANDSCAPE |
|
|
|
|
3 | (6) |
|
|
6 | (3) |
|
2 Local Parties and Their Leaders |
|
|
9 | (30) |
|
|
11 | (4) |
|
2.2 Data Sources for Local Party Chairs |
|
|
15 | (7) |
|
2.2.1 Survey of Local Party Chairs |
|
|
16 | (4) |
|
2.2.2 Interviews with Local Party Chairs |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
|
22 | (5) |
|
|
27 | (9) |
|
2.4.1 Length of Involvement in Politics |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
3 What Do Local Party Chairs Do? |
|
|
39 | (26) |
|
|
39 | (7) |
|
|
41 | (5) |
|
|
46 | (11) |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
50 | (4) |
|
3.2.4 Community Visibility |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
3.3 Organizing in Elections |
|
|
57 | (5) |
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
4 Chairs and Candidates: Recruiting and Support |
|
|
65 | (32) |
|
4.1 Survey Results: Recruiting |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
4.2 Recruiting: What Chairs Told Us |
|
|
67 | (8) |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
|
69 | (6) |
|
4.3 Who Do They Look For? |
|
|
75 | (8) |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
|
78 | (5) |
|
4.4 Supporting Candidates |
|
|
83 | (12) |
|
|
84 | (5) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (5) |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
5 Local Parties and Election Outcomes |
|
|
97 | (26) |
|
5.1 Local Party Activity and Local Election Outcomes |
|
|
98 | (9) |
|
5.1.1 Estimating the Electoral Consequences of Local Party Activity |
|
|
100 | (7) |
|
5.2 The Role of Local Party Organizations in Presidential Elections |
|
|
107 | (7) |
|
5.3 Local Party Activity and Federal Election Outcomes |
|
|
114 | (4) |
|
|
118 | (5) |
|
PART II HOW CHAIRS VIEW CANDIDATES |
|
|
|
6 Introduction to Part II |
|
|
123 | (10) |
|
6.1 The Conjoint Experiments |
|
|
125 | (4) |
|
6.2 Benefits of Conjoint Designs |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
6.3 How We Analyze the Data |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
6.4 How Should We Interpret Chairs' Choices? |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
7 Money, Commitment, and Community Ties |
|
|
133 | (26) |
|
7.1 Commitment and Political Savvy |
|
|
135 | (9) |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
7.1.2 Experimental Evidence: Effects of Political and Military Experience |
|
|
139 | (5) |
|
|
144 | (6) |
|
7.2.1 Experimental Evidence: Community Roots |
|
|
147 | (3) |
|
|
150 | (6) |
|
7.3.1 Experimental Evidence: Occupation |
|
|
153 | (3) |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
|
159 | (28) |
|
8.1 Are Women Candidates Disadvantaged? |
|
|
160 | (3) |
|
8.2 Does Candidate Gender Matter? |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
8.3 Why Would Women Candidates Be More Viable? |
|
|
165 | (11) |
|
8.3.1 An Affinity Effect? |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
8.3.4 Viewpoint Diversity |
|
|
172 | (2) |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
|
176 | (8) |
|
8.4.1 Gender and "Toughnesss" |
|
|
176 | (4) |
|
8.4.2 #MeToo and Regionality |
|
|
180 | (4) |
|
|
184 | (3) |
|
9 Candidate Race and Ethnicity |
|
|
187 | (34) |
|
9.1 Top-Level Experimental Results |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
9.2 Perceptions of Quality |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
|
193 | (8) |
|
9.3.1 Countywide Attitudes |
|
|
197 | (4) |
|
|
201 | (9) |
|
9.4.1 County Demographics |
|
|
203 | (7) |
|
9.5 Returning to the Interviews: Regional Differences |
|
|
210 | (4) |
|
9.6 Recruiting Minority Candidates |
|
|
214 | (5) |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
10 Candidates' Policy Dispositions |
|
|
221 | (30) |
|
10.1 The Importance of Issues |
|
|
223 | (4) |
|
10.2 Disposition toward Compromise |
|
|
227 | (8) |
|
10.2.1 How Democratic Chairs View Compromise |
|
|
230 | (2) |
|
10.2.2 How Republican Chairs View Compromise |
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
10.3 The Role of Policy Positions |
|
|
235 | (5) |
|
10.4 What Accounts for Party Chair/Primary Voter Rifts? |
|
|
240 | (8) |
|
10.4.1 Do Chairs' Assessments Vary across Contexts? |
|
|
242 | (6) |
|
|
248 | (3) |
|
|
251 | (10) |
|
11.1 The Implications of Local Political Dynamics |
|
|
255 | (3) |
|
11.2 Directions for Future Work |
|
|
258 | (3) |
Appendix |
|
261 | (16) |
Notes |
|
277 | (10) |
Bibliography |
|
287 | (10) |
Index |
|
297 | |