Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Spoliation in the Electronic Age 2015 SPI

, , ,
  • Formāts: height x width x depth: 2750x2187x0.50 mm, weight: 940 g
  • Sērija : Litigation Practice Protfolio Series
  • Izdošanas datums: 30-Oct-2014
  • Izdevniecība: Bna Books
  • ISBN-10: 1617463361
  • ISBN-13: 9781617463365
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Cena: 227,93 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
Spoliation in the Electronic Age 2015 SPIPalielināt
  • Formāts: height x width x depth: 2750x2187x0.50 mm, weight: 940 g
  • Sērija : Litigation Practice Protfolio Series
  • Izdošanas datums: 30-Oct-2014
  • Izdevniecība: Bna Books
  • ISBN-10: 1617463361
  • ISBN-13: 9781617463365
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/9781617463365.html
I Introduction
1(2)
A Why Spoliation?
1(1)
B Overview of Basic Principles
1(2)
II Elements of Spoliation
3(8)
A The Growth of the Spoliation Doctrine
3(1)
B Spoliation Defined
3(4)
1 Element one: The duty to preserve
4(1)
2 Element two: Culpability
5(1)
a Levels of culpability
5(1)
b Culpability necessary for adverse inference or sanctions
5(1)
c Element three: Relevance/prejudice
6(1)
C Culpability and Sanctions
7(4)
1 No set minimum culpability level for adverse inference sanctions in the Second Circuit
7(1)
2 Circuits requiring bad faith before imposing adverse inference sanctions
7(1)
3 Circuits that do not require bad faith before imposing adverse inference sanctions
8(1)
4 States where mere negligence can support spoliation sanctions
9(2)
III Preventing Spoliation
11(9)
A Introduction
11(1)
B Creating, Implementing, and Auditing an Effective Document Retention Plan
11(2)
1 Creating a defensible document retention plan
11(1)
2 Learn the IT infrastructure
12(1)
3 Designing the document retention policy
12(1)
4 Implementation of the document retention plan
13(1)
a Formally train employees
13(1)
b Ensuring compliance
13(1)
C Implementing a Proper Legal Hold When Required
13(3)
1 Duty to preserve
13(2)
2 Identifying items to preserve
15(1)
D Disabling Auto-Delete and Retention Policies
16(1)
1 Retention policies
16(1)
2 Auto-delete policies
16(1)
E The Litigation Hold Notice
17(1)
F Issuing the Litigation Hold Notice
17(1)
G Monitoring Compliance With the Litigation Hold
18(2)
1 The don'ts of following up
18(1)
2 The do's of following up
19(1)
H Keeping Comprehensive Records of Every Preservation Step
20(1)
PAGE
I Plaintiff's Preservation Obligations
20(1)
J What to Do If Things Go Wrong
20(1)
K Examples of Cases Where the Court Refused to Grant Sanctions
21(4)
1 Calixto v. Watson Bowman Acme Corp.
21(1)
2 Southeastern Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Brody
22(1)
3 J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. v. Adams
23(1)
4 United States v. Maxxam, Inc.
23(1)
5 Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Country Gourmet Foods, LLC
23(2)
IV Sources of Sanctions and Other Rules Addressing Spoliation
25(16)
A Sanctions for Litigation Misconduct
25(1)
B Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(g)
26(1)
C Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37
26(7)
1 Rule 37(b)(2)
26(1)
a Examples of cases where sanctions were sought under FRCP 37(b)(2)
27(1)
(1) Green v. Blitz U.S.A., Inc.
27(1)
(2) Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global Naps, Inc.
28(1)
(3) Gutman v. Klein
28(1)
(4) Arista Records, L.L.C. v. Tschirhart
28(1)
2 Rule 37(e)
28(1)
a Examples of cases under rule 37(e)
29(1)
(1) Krause
29(1)
(2) Doe v. Norwalk Community College
30(1)
3 Proposed updates to FRCP 37
30(1)
a A short history on the proposals re FRCP 37
30(1)
(1) Actions taken by the Discovery Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules
30(1)
(2) Congressional actions
31(1)
b The Standing Committee's proposed amendments to FRCP 37(e)
31(1)
(1) Details regarding the first round of proposed changes to FRCP 37(e)
31(1)
(2) Comments gathered on the proposed rule changes
32(1)
(3) Revisions to the proposed FRCP 37(e)
32(1)
(4) Final steps in the rulemaking process
32(1)
D Inherent Authority of the Court
33(1)
E State Rules
33(2)
1 California
33(1)
2 New York
34(1)
F Unclean Hands Doctrine
35(1)
G Tort of Spoliation
36(1)
1 California
36(1)
2 Texas
36(1)
3 Delaware
36(1)
4 New York
37(1)
H Obstruction of Justice
37(4)
1 Federal law
37(1)
a 18 U.S.C. § 1503
37(1)
b 18 U.S.C. § 1519
37(1)
c 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)
38(1)
2 State law
38(1)
3 Attorneys' ethics rules
38(1)
a ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct
39(1)
b Courts enforcing the ABA Model Rules
39(2)
V When Spoliation Is Suspected
41(10)
A The Limits of Preservation Discovery
41(1)
B Making the Case for "Heightened" Preservation Discovery
42(1)
C First Steps---Preservation Orders and Forensic Imaging
43(1)
1 Standards for entering preservation orders
43(1)
2 Forensic preservation
43(1)
D Means of Discovery Into Spoliation
44(1)
E Goals of Spoliation Discovery
44(2)
1 Duty to preserve
45(1)
2 Circumstances and magnitude of the loss
45(1)
3 Mitigating loss: backup sources
45(1)
4 Culpability
45(1)
F Overcoming Privilege and Work Product Concerns
46(5)
1 Privilege and work product doctrines in data preservation scenarios
46(1)
a Examples of courts finding work product protection
47(1)
b Examples of courts finding no privilege or work product protection
47(1)
2 Subject-matter waiver
47(2)
3 Crime/fraud exception
49(2)
VI Seeking Sanctions or Other Consequences for Spoliation
51(12)
A Range of Sanctions Available
51(10)
1 Monetary sanctions
51(1)
a Examples of cases where monetary sanctions were imposed as reimbursement for the injured party's expenses
52(1)
(1) Cache La Poudre Feeds LLC v. Land O'Lakes, Inc.
52(1)
(2) Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
52(1)
b Examples of cases in which punitive monetary sanctions were imposed
52(1)
(1) United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
52(1)
(2) Passlogix, Inc. v. 2FA Technology, LLC
53(1)
2 Preclusion from presenting evidence or arguments
53(1)
a Examples of cases in which the court imposed preclusion sanctions
53(1)
(1) Barsoum v. New York City Housing Authority
53(1)
(2) Innis Arden Golf Club v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.
53(1)
(3) Unigard Security Insurance Co. v. Lakewood Engineering & Manufacturing Corp.
54(1)
3 Adverse inference instructions
54(1)
a Examples of cases in which the court issued adverse inference instructions
55(1)
(1) Zubulake v. UBS Warburg (Zubulake V)
55(1)
(2) Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. Cammarata
55(1)
(3) Nursing Home Pension Fund v. Oracle Corp.
56(1)
(4) In re NTL, Inc. Securities Litigation
56(1)
4 Civil contempt sanctions
57(1)
5 Partial or full default judgment or dismissal
57(1)
a Examples of cases where default judgment was entered
58(1)
(1) Boswell v. GumbayTay
58(1)
(2) Century ML-Cable Corp. v. Conjugal Partnership
58(1)
b Examples of cases that were dismissed
59(1)
(1) Beers v. General Motors Corp.
59(1)
(2) McMunn v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
59(1)
6 Cost shifting and restoration costs
59(1)
7 Cost taxing
60(1)
B Motions for Sanctions
61(2)
1 When to file?
61(1)
2 What to include
61(1)
3 What to ask for
62(1)
VII Defending Against Charges of Spoliation
63(38)
A Generally
63(1)
B No Prejudice
63(2)
1 No prejudice when data and evidence still available
63(1)
2 Importance of showing that missing evidence would aid the moving party or that evidence was intentionally destroyed
64(1)
a In re Kmart Corp.
64(1)
b Hamre v. Mizra
64(1)
c Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corp.
64(1)
C Alternative Sources of Information
65(1)
D Insufficient Culpability
66(35)
Practice Tools 101