Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: State Accountability under International Law: Holding States Accountable for a Breach of Jus Cogens Norms [Taylor & Francis e-book]

(The Chinese University of Hong Kong)
  • Taylor & Francis e-book
  • Cena: 173,42 €*
  • * this price gives unlimited concurrent access for unlimited time
  • Standarta cena: 247,75 €
  • Ietaupiet 30%

This book considers the extent to which States are held accountable for breaches of jus cogens norms under international law. The concept of State accountability is distinguished from the doctrine of State responsibility and refers to an ad hoc practice in international relations that seeks to ensure States do not escape with impunity when they violate norms that are considered fundamental to the interests of the international community as a whole.

State Accountability under International Law sets forth a definition of State accountability and establishes a threshold against which the existence, or not, of State accountability can be determined. Using a Foucauldian influenced interpretive methodology, this book adopts a novel construction of State accountability as having legal, political and even moral characteristics. It argues that the international community seeks to hold States accountable utilising a variety of traditional and non-traditional responses that cumulatively recognise that the institutions that comprise and legitimise the State were instrumental in the particular breach. Using case studies taken from State practice from throughout the twentieth century and covering a range of geographic contexts, the conclusion is that there is evidence that State accountability, as it is conceptualised here, is evolving into a legal principle.

The book draws together the many academic theories relating to accountability that have arisen in various areas of international law including environmental law, human rights and trade law before going on to examine an emerging practice of State accountability. A variety of ad hoc attempts and informal mechanisms are assessed against the threshold of State accountability established, with emphasis being given to practical examples ranging from the accountability of Germany and Japan after World War Two to the current attempts to seek accountability from Russia for former crimes of the USSR.

Acknowledgements xiii
Preface xv
Introduction 1(8)
1 The interpretive framework
2(2)
2 The substantive concept
4(5)
1 Breaking state accountability down to its conceptual parts
9(25)
1.1 `Accountability'
9(19)
1.1.1 Linguistic interpretation
11(2)
1.1.1.1 The difference between accountability and responsibility
13(1)
1.1.1.2 The relationship between accountability and impunity
14(4)
1.1.2 A trend toward bottom-up accountability?
18(2)
1.1.3 Interpreting accountability in the context of human rights
20(6)
1.1.4 Is there a legal obligation to ensure accountability?
26(2)
1.1.5 A working understanding of accountability
28(1)
1.2 The `state'
28(4)
1.3 Conclusion
32(2)
2 State accountability as a conceptual whole
34(27)
2.1 The scope of the ad hoc accountability practice for analysis
35(6)
2.2 A tentative set of acountability criteria
41(18)
2.2.1 Is state accountability associated with criminal accountability?
42(8)
2.2.2 Is state accountability associated with state responsibility?
50(2)
2.2.3 Is state accountability associated with the particular law breached?
52(3)
2.2.4 Is state accountability solely associated with legal accountability?
55(2)
2.2.5 Is state accountability associated with political or moral accountability?
57(2)
2.3 Conclusion
59(2)
3 The relationship between state accountability and jus cogens norms
61(13)
3.1 Jus cogens as the link between conceptual state accounlability and established international law
61(1)
3.2 The debate and attempting to define jus cogens
62(8)
3.2.1 Distinguishing jus cogens norms from standard norms
63(2)
3.2.2 The source and substance of jus cogens
65(2)
3.2.3 Are states under a positive duty to comply and ensure compliance with jus cogens norms?
67(1)
3.2.4 Which norms are jus cogens norms?
68(2)
3.3 A working definition of jus cogens
70(3)
3.4 Conclusion
73(1)
4 The relationship between conceptual state accountability and doctrinal state responsibility
74(20)
4.1 An introduction to the doctrine of state responsibility
74(4)
4.2 State responsibility under the ILC's Draft Articles
78(11)
4.2.1 Can the international community as a whole invoke state responsibility?
79(3)
4.2.2 Is state responsibility for violating an erga omnes obligation effectual in terms of holding states accountable for breaching the underlying jus cogens norm?
82(2)
4.2.3 How effective is reparation under the Draft Articles in holding states accountable?
84(5)
4.3 Juridical support for state accountability in the context of the state responsibility doctrine
89(4)
4.4 Conclusion
93(1)
5 State accountability in state practice
94(61)
5.1 Setting the scene to analyse state accountability in practice
94(6)
5.1.1 Who determines whether a state breached international law?
95(4)
5.1.2 What forms of redress ensure the breaching state is held accountable?
99(1)
5.1.3 Is state accountability solely a state prerogative?
100(1)
5.2 Case studies
100(52)
5.2.1 Armenian massacre 1915
100(10)
5.2.2 Crimes against humanity by the USSR - Holdomor famine 1933 and the Katyn Forest massacre 1940
110(10)
5.2.3 Apartheid in South Africa
120(9)
5.2.4 Comparing responses to state aggresion in the 20th century
129(1)
5.2.4.1 Invasion of the Republic of Korea 1950
130(3)
5.2.4.2 Bombing of the Osiraq Nuclear Reactor 1981
133(2)
5.2.4.3 Invasion of Kuwait 1990
135(5)
5.2.4.4 Conclusions on the responses to state aggression
140(2)
5.2.5 Australia's `stolen generation'
142(10)
5.3 Conclusion
152(3)
Conclusion: An accountability epoch?
155(11)
1 State accountability has no normative standing
158(1)
2 State practice is indicative rather than determinative of state accountability
158(1)
3 State accountability is a legal, political and moral concept
159(1)
4 State accountability represents a continuum of answerability
160(1)
5 State accountability is sought on the basis of a norm's substance, not its jus cogens status
161(1)
6 Characterstics of state accountability
162(2)
6.1 A mix of motivations
162(1)
6.2 A mix of accountability seekers
163(1)
6.3 A mix of responses
163(1)
7 Moving from lex feranda to lex lata?
164(2)
Bibliography 166(15)
Index 181
Lisa Yarwood is a lecturer in Law at the University of Exeter.