Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Sustainability and the U.S. EPA [Mīkstie vāki]

  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 286 pages, height x width: 229x152 mm
  • Izdošanas datums: 08-Oct-2011
  • Izdevniecība: National Academies Press
  • ISBN-10: 0309212529
  • ISBN-13: 9780309212526
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 43,01 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 286 pages, height x width: 229x152 mm
  • Izdošanas datums: 08-Oct-2011
  • Izdevniecība: National Academies Press
  • ISBN-10: 0309212529
  • ISBN-13: 9780309212526
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Sustainability is based on a simple and long-recognized factual premise: Everything that humans require for their survival and well-being depends, directly or indirectly, on the natural environment. The environment provides the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the food we eat. Recognizing the importance of sustainability to its work, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been working to create programs and applications in a variety of areas to better incorporate sustainability into decision-making at the agency. To further strengthen the scientific basis for sustainability as it applies to human health and environmental protection, the EPA asked the National Research Council (NRC) to provide a framework for incorporating sustainability into the EPA's principles and decision-making. This framework, Sustainability and the U.S. EPA, provides recommendations for a sustainability approach that both incorporates and goes beyond an approach based on assessing and managing the risks posed by pollutants that has largely shaped environmental policy since the 1980s. Although risk-based methods have led to many successes and remain important tools, the report concludes that they are not adequate to address many of the complex problems that put current and future generations at risk, such as depletion of natural resources, climate change, and loss of biodiversity. Moreover, sophisticated tools are increasingly available to address cross-cutting, complex, and challenging issues that go beyond risk management. The report recommends that EPA formally adopt as its sustainability paradigm the widely used "three pillars" approach, which means considering the environmental, social, and economic impacts of an action or decision. Health should be expressly included in the "social" pillar. EPA should also articulate its vision for sustainability and develop a set of sustainability principles that would underlie all agency policies and programs.
Summary 1(6)
1 Introduction
7(8)
EPA's Mission and Role
8(3)
Committee's Task
11(1)
Committee's Approach to the Task
11(2)
Structure of the Report
13(1)
References
14(1)
2 History of Sustainability
15(20)
Conservation in the United States
16(1)
Environmental Protection in the United States
17(2)
Sustainable Development
19(10)
Findings and Recommendations
29(1)
References
29(6)
3 A Sustainability Framework for EPA
35(18)
Introduction
35(1)
The Sustainability Framework
36(4)
The Sustainability Framework: Level 1 Components
40(9)
Findings and Recommendations
49(1)
References
50(3)
4 Sustainability Assessment and Management: Process Tools and Indicators
53(26)
Elements of Sustainability Assessment and Management
53(19)
Findings and Recommendations
72(2)
References
74(5)
5 How Risk Assessment and Risk Management Relate to the Sustainability Framework
79(14)
Inference Guidelines and Operational Procedures
81(1)
Limitations of the Risk Assessment and Risk Management Paradigm
82(1)
Evolution of the Risk Assessment and Risk Management Paradigm
82(4)
The Interface Between the Risk Assessment and Risk Management Paradigm and Sustainability
86(3)
Findings and Recommendations
89(1)
References
90(3)
6 Changing the Culture in EPA
93(18)
Effecting Cultural Change in the Agency
93(3)
Research and Development
96(10)
Findings and Recommendations
106(2)
References
108(3)
7 Benefits of a Sustainability Approach at EPA
111(16)
Daunting Challenges
112(2)
Probable Benefits of a More Robust Approach to Sustainability
114(3)
Conclusion: The Journey Ahead
117(5)
Findings and Recommendations
122(1)
References
123(4)
APPENDIXES
A The Committee on Incorporating Sustainability in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
127(6)
B Statement Of Task
133(2)
C Glossary
135(4)
References
137(2)
D Sustainability in the OECD
139(4)
References
140(3)
E Sustainability Indicators
143
References
149