Dedications |
|
xxi | |
Introduction |
|
xxiii | |
|
Chapter 1 Pretrial Preparation and Motion Practice |
|
|
3 | (64) |
|
§ 1.01 Scheduling the Trial |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
[ A] Setting the Case for Trial in Accordance With Local Rules |
|
|
3 | (13) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
[ a] Methods of Setting for Trial |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
[ b] Consequences of Failure to Set Case for Trial |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
[ c] Notice of Setting for Trial |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
[ d] Expedited Trial Settings |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
[ e] Preferential Settings |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Announcements at Docket Calls |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
[ b] Consequences of Failure to Announce |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
[ 3] Dismissals for Want of Prosecution |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Villarreal v. San Antonio Truck & Equipment |
|
|
7 | (4) |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
Smith v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co., Inc. |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (17) |
|
[ 1] Continuance for Absence of Counsel: The Scheduling Dilemma |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
[ a] Conflicting Engagements |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
[ b] Withdrawal of Counsel |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Continuance for Want of Testimony (Missing Witness) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
|
25 | (3) |
|
[ 3] Continuance for Absence of a Party |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
[ 4] Legislative Continuance |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
§ 1.02 Obtaining a Trial by Jury |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
[ A] The Right to a Jury Trial in Texas |
|
|
33 | (9) |
|
State of Texas v. Credit Bureau of Laredo, Inc. |
|
|
33 | (4) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
[ B] Jury Fee, Demand, and Waiver |
|
|
42 | (5) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Six Flags Over Texas, Inc. v. Parker |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
[ C] Do You Really Want to Demand a Jury? The Choice Between Trial by Jury and Trial to the Court |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
William V. Dorsaneo III, Texas Litigation Guide |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
§ 1.03 The Motion In Limine and Other Motions on the Eve of Trial |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
[ A] Nature and Use of the Motion in Limine |
|
|
48 | (5) |
|
William V. Dorsaneo III, Texas Litigation Guide |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
Acord v. General Motors Corp. |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
Tempo Tamers, Inc. v. Crow-Houston Four, Ltd. |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
[ B] Practical Use of the Motion in Limine |
|
|
53 | (5) |
|
[ 1] Deciding Upon Subjects of the Motion; Opposing the Motion |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
William V. Dorsaneo III, Texas Litigation Guide |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
William V. Dorsaneo III, Texas Litigation Guide |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
[ C] Other Motions on the Eve of Trial |
|
|
58 | (9) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Appendix---Jury Trials, Trial Settings, Continuances, and Motions In Limine |
|
|
59 | (8) |
|
|
67 | (114) |
|
§ 2.01 Selection of Jury Panel |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
[ B] Mechanical or Electronic System |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (3) |
|
[ 1] Number of Jurors; Panel Selection |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
[ E] Assignment for Service |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
[ 1] Interchangeable Juries |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Juries in Other Counties |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
§ 2.02 Voir Dire Examination |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
[ A] Purpose and Scope of Examination |
|
|
74 | (21) |
|
Hyundai Motor Co. v. Vasquez |
|
|
74 | (15) |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
|
91 | (3) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
[ B] Challenges for Cause |
|
|
95 | (15) |
|
[ 1] Statutory Disqualification Grounds |
|
|
95 | (3) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Cortez ex rel. Puentes v. HCCI-San Antonio, Inc. |
|
|
99 | (6) |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
[ 3] Preservation of Error |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Hallett v. Houston Northwest Medical Center |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
[ C] Peremptory Challenges |
|
|
110 | (27) |
|
[ 1] Properly Allocating the Number of Peremptory Strikes |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (4) |
|
Patterson Dental Company v. Dunn |
|
|
114 | (5) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Constitutionally Flawed Peremptory Challenges |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
[ a] Impermissible Bases for Exercising Peremptory Strikes |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Davis v. Fisk Electric Co. |
|
|
123 | (10) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
[ b] Procedures for Urging Batson Challenges and Burden of Proof |
|
|
133 | (3) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
§ 2.03 Jury Selection in Practice |
|
|
137 | (27) |
|
[ A] The Conduct of the Voir Dire Examination in Practice |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
D. Crump, Attorneys' Goals and Tactics in Voir Dire Examination |
|
|
137 | (5) |
|
A Sample Voir Dire Examination: Examination by Joseph D. Jamail In Aspromonte v. General Motors |
|
|
142 | (21) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
[ B] The Exercise of Peremptory Challenges |
|
|
164 | (17) |
|
Sample Jury Information Forms and Jury Strikes: D. Crump, The Anatomy of a Civil Suit: Obiedio v. J. Weingarten, Inc. |
|
|
164 | (10) |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
Appendix---Jury Selection |
|
|
176 | (5) |
|
|
181 | (96) |
|
§ 3.01 The Order of Proceedings in a Jury Trial |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
[ A] The Events in a Trial |
|
|
181 | (5) |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
[ 4] Order and Nature of Proof |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
[ 5] The Motion for Instructed Verdict |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
[ 8] Jury Deliberations and Receipt of Verdict |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
[ 9] Judgment and New Trial |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
[ B] The Right to Open and Close |
|
|
186 | (9) |
|
Montoya v. Nueces Vacuum Service, Inc. |
|
|
186 | (8) |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
§ 3.02 Opening Statements |
|
|
195 | (5) |
|
Ranger Insurance Co. v. Rogers |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
§ 3.03 Invoking "The Rule" |
|
|
200 | (9) |
|
Drilex Systems, Inc. v. Flores |
|
|
200 | (9) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
§ 3.04 The Mechanics of Presenting Proof |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
[ A] Exhibits: Presenting and Excluding Evidence |
|
|
209 | (6) |
|
Guetersloh v. C.I.T. Corp. |
|
|
209 | (2) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Dorsaneo & Johnson, Texas Civil Trial Guide |
|
|
211 | (4) |
|
|
215 | (4) |
|
|
215 | (4) |
|
[ C] Direct Examination of Witnesses: The Format of Making One's Proof |
|
|
219 | (15) |
|
D. Crump, Some Problems of Direct Examination and Their Solutions |
|
|
219 | (4) |
|
Introduction to Sample Direct Examination of Plaintiff as Witness in Obiedio v. J. Weingarten, Inc. |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
A Sample Witness Examination: Excerpts From Testimony of the Plaintiff, Record at 81-94, Obiedio v. J. Weingarten, Inc. |
|
|
224 | (9) |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
[ D] The Relationship Between the Evidence and Instructed Verdict |
|
|
234 | (5) |
|
Note on Instructed Verdict |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
J. Weingarten, Inc. v. Obiedio |
|
|
234 | (5) |
|
[ E] Cross-Examination and Examination of Adverse Parties |
|
|
239 | (2) |
|
Kiel v. Texas Employers Insurance Association |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
Truco Properties, Inc. v. Charlton |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
[ F] Use of Discovery Materials at Trial |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
[ G] Use of Opinion Testimony at Trial |
|
|
242 | (17) |
|
[ 1] Overview: Lay and Expert Testimony |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
Dorsaneo & Johnson, Texas Civil Trial Guide |
|
|
242 | (3) |
|
[ 2] The Texas Supreme Court Applies Daubert/Robinson |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. |
|
|
245 | (12) |
|
|
257 | (2) |
|
[ H] Control by the Court of the Presentation of Proof: Comments, Rulings, and Preservation of Error |
|
|
259 | (9) |
|
[ 1] Prejudicial Comments; Preserving Error as to Excluded Evidence |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
J. Pope & C.E. Hampton, Presenting And Excluding Evidence |
|
|
259 | (3) |
|
Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Garza |
|
|
262 | (4) |
|
[ 2] Preserving Error as to Admitted Evidence |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
§ 3.05 Trial Motion Practice |
|
|
268 | (9) |
|
William V. Dorsaneo III, Texas Litigation Guide |
|
|
268 | (3) |
|
Appendix---Invoking the Rule and Expert Testimony |
|
|
271 | (6) |
|
Chapter 4 The Jury Charge |
|
|
277 | (130) |
|
§ 4.01 The Jury Charge---Background and Overview |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
[ A] The Purpose of the Jury Charge |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
[ B] A Sample Texas Jury Charge |
|
|
278 | (7) |
|
[ 1] Broad Form Submission |
|
|
278 | (6) |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Separate and Distinct Submission |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
[ C] Historical Development and Pervasive Issues |
|
|
285 | (16) |
|
[ 1] Pre-1973: Specific Questions (Special Issues) |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
[ 2] The Transition Period: 1973-1988 |
|
|
286 | (2) |
|
[ 3] Treatment of the Inferential Rebuttal Defense |
|
|
288 | (2) |
|
|
290 | (1) |
|
Brown v. American Transfer and Storage Co. |
|
|
291 | (3) |
|
|
294 | (1) |
|
[ 5] The Court Commits to Broad Form |
|
|
294 | (1) |
|
Island Recreational Development Corp. v. Republic of Texas Savings Association |
|
|
294 | (7) |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
§ 4.02 Mandatory Broad-Form Submission: The Current System |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
|
302 | (29) |
|
Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B. |
|
|
302 | (2) |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
|
304 | (3) |
|
H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Warner |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
Crown Life Insurance Co. v. Casteel |
|
|
308 | (6) |
|
|
314 | (2) |
|
|
316 | (10) |
|
|
326 | (5) |
|
Practice Exercise #10 (Jury Questions) |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
[ B] The Relationship of Explanatory Instructions and Definitions to the Jury Questions |
|
|
331 | (27) |
|
[ 1] Historical Development and Overview |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Relating Instructions and Definitions to "Jury Questions" |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
Diamond Offshore Management Co. v. Guidry |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
[ 3] When Instructions are "Proper" |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
|
333 | (2) |
|
|
335 | (2) |
|
[ 4] Improper Judicial Comments: Instructions that Nudge the Jury, Comment on the Weight of the Evidence, or Inform the Jury of the Effect of its Answers |
|
|
337 | (1) |
|
Acord v. General Motors Corp. |
|
|
337 | (3) |
|
Maddox v. Denka Chemical Corp. |
|
|
340 | (2) |
|
Lone Star Gas Co. v. Lemond |
|
|
342 | (2) |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
[ 5] Submission of Inferential Rebuttal Instructions |
|
|
345 | (1) |
|
Dillard v. Texas Electric Cooperative |
|
|
345 | (5) |
|
[ 6] Informing Jurors of Effect of Answers on Judgment |
|
|
350 | (1) |
|
H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Bilotto |
|
|
350 | (6) |
|
|
356 | (2) |
|
Practice Exercise #11 (Instructions and Definitions) |
|
|
358 | (1) |
|
§ 4.03 Requests to Charge and Objections to the Charge |
|
|
358 | (12) |
|
[ A] Preservation of Charge Complaints |
|
|
358 | (1) |
|
|
359 | (1) |
|
William V. Dorsaneo, III, Revision and Recodification of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Concerning the Jury Charge |
|
|
359 | (1) |
|
Lyles v. Texas Employers' Insurance Association |
|
|
360 | (1) |
|
|
361 | (1) |
|
[ 2] The Texas Supreme Court's New Approach |
|
|
361 | (1) |
|
State Dep't of Highways and Public Transp. v. Payne |
|
|
361 | (6) |
|
|
367 | (3) |
|
[ B] The Timing of Objections and Requests |
|
|
370 | (6) |
|
Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Cross |
|
|
370 | (5) |
|
|
375 | (1) |
|
[ C] The Manner of Making Requests to Charge and Objections to the Court's Proposed Charge |
|
|
376 | (12) |
|
|
376 | (1) |
|
Monsanto Company v. Milam |
|
|
376 | (3) |
|
|
379 | (1) |
|
Department of Human Services v. Hinds |
|
|
379 | (4) |
|
Dallas Market Center Development v. Liedeker |
|
|
383 | (2) |
|
|
385 | (2) |
|
Practice Exercise #12 (Objections and Requests) |
|
|
387 | (1) |
|
[ D] The Consequences of Failure to Object |
|
|
388 | (19) |
|
[ 1] Waiver of Substantive Legal Theory |
|
|
388 | (1) |
|
|
388 | (3) |
|
Holland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
|
|
391 | (3) |
|
|
394 | (3) |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
Hawes v. Central Texas Production Credit Association |
|
|
397 | (2) |
|
|
399 | (1) |
|
|
399 | (2) |
|
|
401 | (2) |
|
Appendix---The Jury Charge |
|
|
403 | (4) |
|
|
407 | (48) |
|
§ 5.01 The Legitimate Functions of Argument to the Jury |
|
|
407 | (13) |
|
Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Reese |
|
|
407 | (8) |
|
|
415 | (1) |
|
Mcinnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. |
|
|
416 | (2) |
|
|
418 | (2) |
|
§ 5.02 How Jury Argument Works in Practice |
|
|
420 | (10) |
|
Crump, Effective Jury Argument: The Organization |
|
|
420 | (2) |
|
|
422 | (1) |
|
Court's Charge in Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco, Inc. |
|
|
423 | (2) |
|
Excerpts From Jury Arguments or Summations in Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco, Inc. |
|
|
425 | (5) |
|
§ 5.03 Proper and Improper Types of Jury Argument |
|
|
430 | (1) |
|
[ A] Appeals to Passion and Prejudice |
|
|
430 | (9) |
|
Matter of Marriage of Knighton |
|
|
430 | (3) |
|
Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Guerrero |
|
|
433 | (5) |
|
|
438 | (1) |
|
[ B] Evidence, Remarks Outside the Record, and Inferences from the Evidence |
|
|
439 | (4) |
|
Younger Brothers, Inc. v. Myers |
|
|
439 | (2) |
|
|
441 | (2) |
|
[ C] Arguments About the Law and Arguments Diverting the Jury from its Duty |
|
|
443 | (3) |
|
|
445 | (1) |
|
[ D] Personal Invective and Accusations of Misconduct |
|
|
446 | (2) |
|
American Petrofina, Inc. v. PPG Industries, Inc. |
|
|
446 | (2) |
|
|
448 | (1) |
|
[ E] The "Open Door" or "Invited Argument" Doctrine |
|
|
448 | (7) |
|
|
448 | (3) |
|
|
451 | (1) |
|
|
452 | (1) |
|
|
453 | (2) |
|
Chapter 6 Jury Deliberations and the Verdict |
|
|
455 | (62) |
|
|
455 | (1) |
|
§ 6.02 Conduct of Jury During Deliberations |
|
|
455 | (1) |
|
[ A] The Jury's "Code of Conduct" |
|
|
455 | (8) |
|
|
461 | (1) |
|
|
462 | (1) |
|
[ B] Misconduct During Deliberation and the Harmless Error Rule |
|
|
463 | (20) |
|
|
464 | (4) |
|
Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. Jackson |
|
|
468 | (12) |
|
|
480 | (3) |
|
§ 6.03 The Conduct of the Court: Post-Deliberation Commencement Communications |
|
|
483 | (1) |
|
[ A] Responding to Communications From the Jurors |
|
|
483 | (3) |
|
Garza v. San Antonio Light |
|
|
483 | (3) |
|
|
486 | (1) |
|
[ B] The Use of Verdict-Urging Instructions |
|
|
486 | (2) |
|
§ 6.04 Receipt of Verdict |
|
|
488 | (1) |
|
[ A] The "Duty" to Receive the Verdict and Render Judgment |
|
|
488 | (4) |
|
McCauley v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company |
|
|
488 | (3) |
|
|
491 | (1) |
|
[ B] The Partial Verdict; Consequences of Failure to Insist on a Complete Verdict |
|
|
492 | (9) |
|
|
492 | (2) |
|
|
494 | (2) |
|
Garcia v. Spohn Health System |
|
|
496 | (4) |
|
|
500 | (1) |
|
[ C] Conflicting Findings |
|
|
501 | (16) |
|
First Nat. Bank at Lubbock v. J.E. Mitchell Co. |
|
|
501 | (4) |
|
|
505 | (1) |
|
|
505 | (1) |
|
Little Rock Furniture Mfg. Co. v. Dunn |
|
|
505 | (5) |
|
|
510 | (3) |
|
Appendix---Jury Deliberations and the Jury Verdict |
|
|
513 | (4) |
|
|
517 | (32) |
|
§ 7.01 Characteristics of a Nonjury Trial |
|
|
517 | (1) |
|
[ A] Differences from Jury Trial: Consideration of Evidence |
|
|
517 | (1) |
|
[ B] Order of Trial Proceedings |
|
|
518 | (1) |
|
|
518 | (1) |
|
|
519 | (1) |
|
[ E] The Function of Express Findings and Conclusions |
|
|
519 | (2) |
|
[ 1] Presumption of Implied Findings |
|
|
519 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Effect of Trial Judge's Express Findings |
|
|
520 | (1) |
|
[ F] The Procedure for Requesting Findings and Conclusions |
|
|
521 | (1) |
|
|
521 | (1) |
|
[ G] Effect of Requests for Findings on Appellate Timetable |
|
|
522 | (5) |
|
IKB Industries v. Pro-Line Corp. |
|
|
522 | (4) |
|
|
526 | (1) |
|
[ H] The Consequences of a Trial Court's Failure to Make Findings |
|
|
527 | (13) |
|
[ 1] Interference with the Proper Presentation of the Appeal |
|
|
527 | (1) |
|
|
527 | (3) |
|
Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation v. Sealy Independent School District |
|
|
530 | (1) |
|
|
530 | (3) |
|
[ 2] Omitted and Presumed Findings |
|
|
533 | (1) |
|
|
533 | (6) |
|
|
539 | (1) |
|
[ I] Additional Findings of Fact |
|
|
540 | (4) |
|
|
540 | (2) |
|
Western Steel Co. v. Coast Investment Corp. |
|
|
542 | (1) |
|
|
543 | (1) |
|
|
543 | (1) |
|
§ 7.02 Bases for Challenging Trial Court's Findings of Fact |
|
|
544 | (5) |
|
|
544 | (3) |
|
|
547 | (2) |
|
Chapter 8 Taking the Case Away From the Jury: Instructed Verdict and Post-Trial Motions |
|
|
549 | (98) |
|
§ 8.01 The Standards for Granting Motions for Instructed Verdict and Post-Trial Motions |
|
|
549 | (5) |
|
§ 8.02 Motion for Instructed Verdict |
|
|
554 | (1) |
|
[ A] The Standards for Granting an Instructed Verdict |
|
|
554 | (25) |
|
[ 1] No Evidence: The Standard for Instructing a Verdict in Favor of the Party Without the Burden of Persuasion |
|
|
554 | (1) |
|
Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc. |
|
|
554 | (3) |
|
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gonzalez |
|
|
557 | (4) |
|
|
561 | (8) |
|
[ 2] Matter of Law: The Standard for Directing a Verdict in Favor of the Party With the Burden of Persuasion |
|
|
569 | (1) |
|
|
569 | (2) |
|
|
571 | (1) |
|
[ 3] Judicial Admissions and Contradictory Testimony |
|
|
572 | (2) |
|
[ 4] Credibility Determinations; Disbelief of Testimony |
|
|
574 | (1) |
|
|
574 | (1) |
|
Obiedio v. J. Weingarten, Inc., Record at 94-98 |
|
|
574 | (1) |
|
|
575 | (1) |
|
[ 5] The Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard |
|
|
575 | (1) |
|
|
576 | (3) |
|
[ B] Procedure for Moving for, and Granting, an Instructed Verdict |
|
|
579 | (3) |
|
[ 1] The Motion Itself: Statement of Grounds |
|
|
579 | (1) |
|
|
580 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Timing of the Motion for Instructed Verdict |
|
|
581 | (1) |
|
[ 3] Effect of Defective Pleadings or Evidence |
|
|
581 | (1) |
|
§ 8.03 The Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or to Disregard Jury Findings |
|
|
582 | (8) |
|
Equistar Chemicals, L.P. v. Dresser-Rand Co. |
|
|
582 | (4) |
|
|
586 | (4) |
|
§ 8.04 The Motion for Judgment on the Verdict |
|
|
590 | (3) |
|
Litton Industrial Products v. Gammage |
|
|
590 | (2) |
|
First National Bank of Beeville v. Fojtik |
|
|
592 | (1) |
|
|
593 | (1) |
|
§ 8.05 The Motion for New Trial |
|
|
593 | (1) |
|
[ A] Nature and Purpose of the Motion |
|
|
593 | (1) |
|
[ B] Procedural Grounds for New Trial |
|
|
594 | (22) |
|
[ 1] New Trial Because of Misconduct of Jury, Party, Attorney, Court Officer, or Third Party |
|
|
594 | (1) |
|
Note on Presenting Matters Not Yet in the Record by the Motion for New Trial |
|
|
594 | (2) |
|
[ 2] New Trial Because of Newly Discovered Evidence |
|
|
596 | (1) |
|
|
596 | (6) |
|
|
602 | (1) |
|
[ 3] A New Trial on Equitable Grounds or for Related Reasons |
|
|
602 | (1) |
|
Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Moody |
|
|
602 | (5) |
|
|
607 | (2) |
|
[ C] New Trial Because of Factual Issues |
|
|
609 | (1) |
|
[ 1] Insufficient Evidence; Great Weight and Preponderance |
|
|
609 | (1) |
|
Cooper v. Argonaut Insurance Co. |
|
|
609 | (3) |
|
|
612 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Excessive or Inadequate Damages; Remittitur |
|
|
613 | (1) |
|
Larson v. Cactus Utility Co. |
|
|
613 | (2) |
|
|
615 | (1) |
|
§ 8.06 Modification of the Trial Court's Judgment; Plenary Power |
|
|
616 | (1) |
|
[ A] Motions to Modify the Trial Court's Judgment |
|
|
616 | (4) |
|
Brazos Elec. Power Co-Op, Inc. v. Callejo |
|
|
616 | (4) |
|
|
620 | (1) |
|
[ B] "Plenary Power" and the Effect of Post-Judgment Motions |
|
|
620 | (13) |
|
Lane Bank Equip. Co. v. Smith Southern Equip., Inc. |
|
|
620 | (6) |
|
|
626 | (1) |
|
|
627 | (1) |
|
|
628 | (2) |
|
|
630 | (1) |
|
|
631 | (1) |
|
|
632 | (1) |
|
[ C] Judgments "Nunc Pro Tunc" |
|
|
633 | (3) |
|
|
633 | (2) |
|
|
635 | (1) |
|
|
636 | (1) |
|
[ D] The Equitable Bill of Review |
|
|
636 | (11) |
|
Appendix---Sufficiency of the Evidence, Motions for the New Trial, and Motions for Judgment N.O.V. |
|
|
641 | (6) |
|
Chapter 9 Review of Final and Interlocutory Orders in the Appellate Courts |
|
|
647 | (34) |
|
§ 9.01 Appealable Orders: The Requirement of Finality and Its Exceptions |
|
|
647 | (9) |
|
|
655 | (1) |
|
§ 9.02 "What Is a Final Judgment" |
|
|
656 | (3) |
|
[ A] A Series of Orders Disposing of All Claims |
|
|
656 | (1) |
|
|
656 | (1) |
|
|
657 | (2) |
|
[ B] Overlooked Claims and the Mother Hubbard Clause |
|
|
659 | (22) |
|
[ 1] Summary Judgments Not Purporting to be Final |
|
|
660 | (1) |
|
|
660 | (1) |
|
[ 2] The Aldridge Presumption and the Birth of Mother Hubbard |
|
|
661 | (2) |
|
[ 3] Mother Hubbard's Replacement: Current Law |
|
|
663 | (1) |
|
|
663 | (9) |
|
|
672 | (3) |
|
|
675 | (4) |
|
Appendix---Appellate Review of Final Judgements and Interlocutory Orders |
|
|
679 | (2) |
|
Chapter 10 The Court of Appeals |
|
|
681 | (72) |
|
§ 10.01 The Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals in Civil Cases |
|
|
681 | (1) |
|
[ A] Amount in Controversy & Geographical Restrictions |
|
|
681 | (7) |
|
Tune v. Texas Department of Public Safety |
|
|
682 | (6) |
|
|
688 | (1) |
|
[ B] General Final Judgment Requirement |
|
|
688 | (1) |
|
[ C] Duty to Exercise Jurisdiction |
|
|
688 | (1) |
|
§ 10.02 Appellate Prerequisites and Preliminary Considerations |
|
|
689 | (1) |
|
[ A] Trial Court Complaint: Preservation of the Right to Complain |
|
|
689 | (4) |
|
|
689 | (2) |
|
|
691 | (2) |
|
[ B] Suspending Enforcement of the Judgment Pending Appeal |
|
|
693 | (9) |
|
|
693 | (5) |
|
|
698 | (4) |
|
|
702 | (6) |
|
|
702 | (5) |
|
|
707 | (1) |
|
§ 10.03 Introduction to the Appellate Process |
|
|
708 | (1) |
|
§ 10.04 Commencement and Modification of the Appellate Process and Timetables |
|
|
709 | (1) |
|
[ A] Effect of Modified Trial Court Judgment |
|
|
709 | (3) |
|
|
709 | (1) |
|
|
710 | (2) |
|
[ B] No Notice of Trial Court's Judgment |
|
|
712 | (1) |
|
St. Louis Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Summerhouse Joint Venture |
|
|
712 | (1) |
|
|
713 | (1) |
|
§ 10.05 Procedures for Prosecuting Ordinary Appeal |
|
|
713 | (1) |
|
[ A] Perfection of the Appeal |
|
|
713 | (9) |
|
[ 1] Preparation and Filing of Notice of Appeal |
|
|
713 | (2) |
|
[ 2] Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal |
|
|
715 | (1) |
|
Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc. |
|
|
715 | (2) |
|
|
717 | (4) |
|
|
721 | (1) |
|
[ B] Preparation and Filing of Appellate Record |
|
|
722 | (5) |
|
|
722 | (1) |
|
CMM Grain Co., Inc. v. Ozgunduz |
|
|
723 | (2) |
|
|
725 | (1) |
|
|
726 | (1) |
|
[ 3] Filing the Clerk's and Reporter's Records |
|
|
727 | (1) |
|
[ C] Preparation and Filing of Appellate Briefs |
|
|
727 | (7) |
|
[ 1] Timetable for Extension of Time to File Briefs |
|
|
727 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Contents of Appellant's Brief |
|
|
728 | (1) |
|
|
728 | (4) |
|
[ 3] Contents of the Appellee's Brief: Reply Points and Cross-Points |
|
|
732 | (1) |
|
[ 4] Appellant's Reply Brief |
|
|
733 | (1) |
|
[ 5] Amended or Supplemental Briefs |
|
|
733 | (1) |
|
§ 10.06 Procedures for Prosecuting Accelerated and Restricted Appeals |
|
|
734 | (1) |
|
|
734 | (2) |
|
|
736 | (6) |
|
|
736 | (5) |
|
|
741 | (1) |
|
|
741 | (1) |
|
|
742 | (4) |
|
§ 10.08 Judgment Making in the Court of Appeals |
|
|
746 | (1) |
|
[ A] Rendition or Remand? |
|
|
746 | (2) |
|
|
747 | (1) |
|
|
748 | (1) |
|
§ 10.09 Motions for Rehearing and en Banc Reconsideration |
|
|
748 | (1) |
|
[ A] Motion for Rehearing |
|
|
748 | (2) |
|
[ B] En Banc Reconsideration |
|
|
750 | (3) |
|
Appendix---Invoking Appellate Jurisdiction and Suspending Judgement Enforcement |
|
|
751 | (2) |
|
Chapter 11 Appellate Proceedings in the Texas Supreme Court |
|
|
753 | (24) |
|
|
753 | (1) |
|
[ A] Appeals From Courts of Appeals |
|
|
753 | (7) |
|
|
754 | (4) |
|
|
758 | (2) |
|
|
760 | (1) |
|
[ B] Direct Appeals From Trial Court |
|
|
761 | (2) |
|
Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. Garcia |
|
|
761 | (1) |
|
|
762 | (1) |
|
§ 11.02 Securing Appellate Review on the Merits |
|
|
763 | (1) |
|
[ A] Appellate Process and Timetable |
|
|
763 | (6) |
|
City of San Antonio v. Hartman |
|
|
765 | (3) |
|
|
768 | (1) |
|
|
768 | (1) |
|
[ B] Obtaining Relief in Texas Supreme Court |
|
|
769 | (1) |
|
[ C] Certified Questions From United States Courts |
|
|
769 | (4) |
|
Amberboy v. Societe de Banque Privee |
|
|
769 | (4) |
|
[ D] Supreme Court Briefing |
|
|
773 | (3) |
|
|
773 | (2) |
|
|
775 | (1) |
|
|
776 | (1) |
|
Chapter 12 Original Proceedings in Appellate Courts |
|
|
777 | (60) |
|
§ 12.01 Constitutional and Statutory Authority for Original Proceedings |
|
|
777 | (1) |
|
[ A] Comparison to Appeals |
|
|
777 | (1) |
|
[ B] Constitutional and Statutory Authority for Original Proceedings |
|
|
778 | (1) |
|
§ 12.02 Mandamus Proceedings |
|
|
779 | (1) |
|
[ A] Mandamus Jurisdiction: Shared Jurisdiction With the Courts of Appeals |
|
|
779 | (3) |
|
|
779 | (2) |
|
|
781 | (1) |
|
[ B] Conditions for Granting the Writ of Mandamus |
|
|
782 | (17) |
|
In re the Prudential Insurance Co. of America |
|
|
783 | (7) |
|
In re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas |
|
|
790 | (6) |
|
|
796 | (1) |
|
|
796 | (1) |
|
|
797 | (2) |
|
[ C] Mandamus Procedure: The Petition, its Consideration, and the Response |
|
|
799 | (3) |
|
|
799 | (1) |
|
Packer v. Fifth Court of Appeals |
|
|
800 | (1) |
|
|
801 | (1) |
|
§ 12.03 Habeas Corpus Proceedings |
|
|
802 | (7) |
|
|
802 | (1) |
|
|
803 | (4) |
|
|
807 | (2) |
|
§ 12.04 Other Original Proceedings in the Appellate Courts |
|
|
809 | (28) |
|
|
815 | (22) |
Index |
|
837 | |