|
|
xvi | |
|
|
xxvii | |
About the authors |
|
xxx | |
Preface |
|
xxxi | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xxxii | |
Tour of the book |
|
xxxiv | |
|
|
1 | (10) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 What is a tort and the history of tort law |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.4 Interests protected by tort law |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
1.5 Limitations of tort law |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.6 `Compensation culture' |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
1.7 Tort law and insurance |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
PART 1 THE TORT OF NEGLIGENCE |
|
|
11 | (152) |
|
|
13 | (29) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
2.2 Foundations of the modern tort of negligence |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
2.3 Establishing a duty of care |
|
|
16 | (8) |
|
2.3.1 From Caparo to Robinson |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
2.3.2 Legally significant features |
|
|
19 | (5) |
|
2.4 Acts vs omissions or misfeasance vs nonfeasance |
|
|
24 | (4) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 When will liability for omissions arise? |
|
|
25 | (3) |
|
2.5 Liability of public bodies |
|
|
28 | (12) |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
2.5.2 Tort and the Human Rights Act 1998 |
|
|
30 | (7) |
|
2.5.3 Is there a specific application of these principles to the police and emergency services? |
|
|
37 | (3) |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (19) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
3.2 What is pure economic loss? |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
3.3 Relational economic loss |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
|
46 | (8) |
|
3.4.1 The development of Hedley Byrne liability |
|
|
50 | (4) |
|
|
54 | (5) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (25) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
4.2 Abandoning the search for a principle |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
4.3 What is `psychiatric harm'? |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
4.4 Distinguishing between primary and secondary victims |
|
|
66 | (16) |
|
|
66 | (7) |
|
|
73 | (9) |
|
4.5 Law in need of reform? |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (19) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
5.2 The objective standard of care |
|
|
87 | (6) |
|
5.2.1 Specific circumstances |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
5.2.2 The relevance of risk |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
5.3 The standard to be applied to children |
|
|
93 | (3) |
|
5.4 The standard to be applied to professionals |
|
|
96 | (4) |
|
5.5 Failure to warn patients of risks |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
5.6 Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism (SARAH) Act 2015 |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (38) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
6.2 Why is the causal inquiry significant and what role does it play? |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
108 | (15) |
|
6.3.1 Basic but for causation |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
6.3.2 Divisible and indivisible injuries |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
|
112 | (3) |
|
6.3.4 Material contribution to injury |
|
|
115 | (3) |
|
6.3.5 Loss of a chance of avoiding an adverse physical outcome |
|
|
118 | (5) |
|
6.4 Exceptions to the but for test |
|
|
123 | (17) |
|
6.4.1 Loss of a chance of achieving a better financial outcome |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
6.4.3 Material contribution to risk |
|
|
126 | (6) |
|
|
132 | (6) |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
|
140 | (3) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (20) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (3) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (6) |
|
7.5 Novus actus interventens |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
7.5.1 Act of a third party |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
7.5.2 Act of the claimant |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
PART 2 TORTS RELATING TO LAND AND GOODS |
|
|
163 | (79) |
|
|
164 | (29) |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
8.3 The Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 - liability to `visitors' |
|
|
167 | (16) |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
8.3.3 What is the content of the occupier's duty? |
|
|
170 | (6) |
|
8.3.4 How can that duty be discharged? |
|
|
176 | (7) |
|
8.4 The Occupiers' Liability Act 1984 - liability to those not classed as `visitors' |
|
|
183 | (8) |
|
8.4.1 Who is classed as a non-visitor? |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
8.4.2 In what circumstances will non-visitors be owed a duty? |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
8.4.3 What is the content of that duty? |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
8.4.4 How can that duty be discharged? |
|
|
189 | (2) |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
|
193 | (24) |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (2) |
|
9.3 Common law negligence |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
9.4 Consumer Protection Act 1987 |
|
|
198 | (14) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (6) |
|
|
209 | (3) |
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
10 Nuisance and the rule in Ryland v Fletcher |
|
|
217 | (25) |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
10.2 What is private nuisance? |
|
|
219 | (7) |
|
10.2.1 Title to sue and nature of damage suffered |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
10.2.2 What amounts to an unreasonable interference |
|
|
221 | (5) |
|
|
226 | (3) |
|
10.3.1 Injunction v damages |
|
|
226 | (3) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
10.4 Defences in private nuisance |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
10.4.3 Statutory authority |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
10.5 The rule in Rylands v Fletcher |
|
|
231 | (6) |
|
10.5.1 Defences to the rule in Rylands v Fletcher |
|
|
234 | (3) |
|
10.6 Public nuisance: a very different thing |
|
|
237 | (2) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
|
242 | (54) |
|
|
243 | (17) |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
11.2 The distinction made by the House of Lords in OSG |
|
|
245 | (6) |
|
11.2.1 Inducing breach of contract |
|
|
247 | (2) |
|
11.2.2 Causing loss by unlawful means |
|
|
249 | (2) |
|
11.3 [ The former tort of) intimidation - now covered by causing loss by unlawful means |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
|
252 | (5) |
|
11.4.1 Lawful means conspiracy Cor simple conspiracy) |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
11.4.2 Unlawful means conspiracy |
|
|
253 | (4) |
|
|
257 | (3) |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
|
258 | (2) |
|
12 International Torts Against the person |
|
|
260 | (36) |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
|
262 | (3) |
|
|
265 | (3) |
|
12.3.1 Intentional threat |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
12.3.2 Immediate and direct violence |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
12.3.3 Reasonable expectation by claimant |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
|
268 | (4) |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
12.4.2 Direct and immediate force |
|
|
268 | (2) |
|
|
270 | (1) |
|
|
270 | (2) |
|
|
272 | (6) |
|
|
272 | (2) |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
12.5.3 False imprisonment within the prison system |
|
|
275 | (3) |
|
|
278 | (5) |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
|
279 | (2) |
|
12.6.3 Self-defence (including defence of others) |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
12.6.4 Contributory negligence |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
12.6.5 Lawful arrest and detention/lawful authority |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
12.7 Additional intentional torts against the person |
|
|
283 | (11) |
|
12.7.1 The tort in Wilkinson v Downton |
|
|
284 | (3) |
|
12.7.2 Protection from Harassment Act 1997 |
|
|
287 | (5) |
|
12.7.3 Malicious prosecution |
|
|
292 | (2) |
|
|
294 | (2) |
|
|
294 | (1) |
|
|
295 | (1) |
|
PART 4 DEFAMATION AND PRIVACY |
|
|
296 | (77) |
|
|
297 | (41) |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
13.2 Defamation structure |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
13.2.1 Was the publication defamatory? |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
13.2.2 Is the publication defensible? |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
13.2.3 What damages should be awa rded7 |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
13.3 Initial issues to consider |
|
|
300 | (9) |
|
13.3.1 Legislative reform |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
|
302 | (2) |
|
|
304 | (5) |
|
13.4 Elements of defamation |
|
|
309 | (10) |
|
13.4.1 Was the publication defamatory? |
|
|
309 | (7) |
|
13.4.2 The statement referred to the claimant |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
13.4.3 The statement was published to a third party |
|
|
317 | (2) |
|
|
319 | (10) |
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
|
321 | (2) |
|
13.5.3 Privilege and public interest |
|
|
323 | (4) |
|
13.5.4 Operators of websites |
|
|
327 | (1) |
|
|
328 | (1) |
|
|
329 | (1) |
|
|
329 | (1) |
|
|
330 | (1) |
|
|
330 | (5) |
|
13.7.1 Human rights and defamation |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
13.7.2 Defamation and social media |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
13.7.3 Society's views and defamation |
|
|
333 | (2) |
|
|
335 | (3) |
|
|
335 | (1) |
|
|
336 | (2) |
|
|
338 | (35) |
|
|
339 | (1) |
|
14.2 Current protection of privacy |
|
|
340 | (8) |
|
14.2.1 Common law protection of privacy |
|
|
340 | (4) |
|
14.2.2 Government regulation of privacy rights |
|
|
344 | (4) |
|
14.3 Breach of confidence |
|
|
348 | (15) |
|
14.3.1 Breach of confidence or `misuse of private information'? |
|
|
350 | (1) |
|
14.3.2 Reasonable expectation of privacy |
|
|
351 | (6) |
|
|
357 | (3) |
|
|
360 | (2) |
|
14.3.5 Breach of confidence: concluding remarks |
|
|
362 | (1) |
|
14.4 A freestanding privacy tort? |
|
|
363 | (6) |
|
14.5 Privacy protection in the 21st century |
|
|
369 | (1) |
|
|
370 | (3) |
|
|
371 | (1) |
|
|
372 | (1) |
|
|
373 | (72) |
|
|
374 | (17) |
|
|
375 | (1) |
|
15.2 The development of the principle |
|
|
375 | (1) |
|
15.3 Relationships of employment |
|
|
376 | (9) |
|
|
377 | (4) |
|
|
381 | (4) |
|
15.4 Non-delegable duties |
|
|
385 | (3) |
|
|
388 | (3) |
|
|
389 | (1) |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
|
391 | (30) |
|
|
392 | (1) |
|
|
393 | (1) |
|
16.3 Contributory negligence |
|
|
394 | (8) |
|
16.3.1 Historical approach to contributory negligence |
|
|
394 | (3) |
|
16.3.2 Elements of contributory negligence |
|
|
397 | (4) |
|
16.3.3 Contributory negligence: concluding remarks |
|
|
401 | (1) |
|
16.4 Volenti non fit injuria |
|
|
402 | (7) |
|
16.4.1 Volenti and consent |
|
|
403 | (1) |
|
16.4.2 Elements of volenti |
|
|
403 | (5) |
|
16.4.3 Volenti: concluding remarks |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
|
409 | (9) |
|
16.5.1 Rationale of illegality |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
16.5.2 Elements of illegality |
|
|
410 | (8) |
|
16.5.3 Illegality: concluding remarks |
|
|
418 | (1) |
|
|
418 | (3) |
|
|
419 | (1) |
|
|
420 | (1) |
|
|
421 | (24) |
|
|
422 | (1) |
|
17.2 Purpose of damages in tort law |
|
|
423 | (3) |
|
|
426 | (1) |
|
|
427 | (3) |
|
|
427 | (3) |
|
17.4.2 Non-pecuniary losses |
|
|
430 | (1) |
|
17.5 Compensating benefits |
|
|
430 | (2) |
|
|
432 | (3) |
|
17.6.1 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 |
|
|
432 | (1) |
|
17.6.2 Fatal Accidents Act 1976 |
|
|
433 | (2) |
|
17.7 Time limitations on tort law claims |
|
|
435 | (4) |
|
17.8 How damages can be awarded |
|
|
439 | (3) |
|
17.9 Contribution and apportionment |
|
|
442 | (1) |
|
|
443 | (2) |
|
|
444 | (1) |
Index |
|
445 | |