Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Transitivity Alternations in Diachrony: Changes in Argument Structure and Voice Morphology

  • Formāts: 325 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 14-Dec-2009
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge Scholars Publishing
  • ISBN-13: 9781443818100
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 81,39 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
Transitivity Alternations in Diachrony: Changes in Argument Structure and Voice MorphologyPalielināt
  • Formāts: 325 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 14-Dec-2009
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge Scholars Publishing
  • ISBN-13: 9781443818100
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

his book offers a new approach to the theory of change in argument structure and voice morphology. It investigates the diachrony of transitivity, and especially the changes in causative verbs and transitivity alternations, based on data mainly from the Greek and English diachrony (all historical data are transcribed and accompanied by glosses and translations into Modern English). Data from earlier periods provide new information on burning questions in both Historical and Theoretical Linguistics. The study shows that (a) causativisations are the result of reanalysis of intransitive verbs as transitive on the basis of the linguistic cue of Case; (b) the changes in voice morphology do not depend on the derivation and direction of new transitivity alternations. Finally, the study demonstrates that the generalisation that guides the changes in voice demands morphological differentiation of the anticausative from the passive types.
List of Tables
vii
Preface ix
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
xi
Chapter One Introduction
1(24)
1.1 Aim and Objectives of the Research
1(2)
1.2 Transitivity, Prototypical Transitivity, and Causativity
3(6)
1.3 Transitivity Alternations
9(5)
1.4 The Study of Transitivity and the Diachronic Approach
14(3)
1.4.1 The problems and the contribution of diachronic study
14(1)
1.4.2 Sources
15(2)
1.5 Terminology Issues
17(3)
1.6 The Structure of the Monograph
20(5)
Chapter Two Theoretical Framework
25(38)
2.1 Transitivity, Syntax, and Lexicon-Syntax Interface
25(25)
2.1.1 Transitivity and syntax
26(10)
2.1.2 Transitivity and lexicon-syntax interface
36(6)
2.1.3 The derivational basis issue: the relationship between the derivation of the transitive and intransitive types
42(2)
2.1.4 Morphology, argument structure, and transitivity
44(4)
2.1.5 Summary
48(2)
2.2 Language Change and Transitivity
50(13)
2.2.1 Generative Grammar and diachrony
50(2)
2.2.2 Language change, language acquisition, and reanalysis
52(1)
2.2.3 Input, cues, and PLD
53(3)
2.2.4 Diachrony and transitivity in Greek: a review of the literature
56(5)
2.2.5 Summary
61(2)
Chapter Three Diachronic Data and Analysis
63(116)
3.1 From Homeric to Classical Greek
63(31)
3.1.1 The overall picture
63(2)
3.1.2 Innovative causative use of intransitive verbs: from ablaut alternation to productive causativisation
65(13)
3.1.3 Derivation and voice of the transitivity alternations: the contrast between the active causative and the non-active anticausative
78(14)
3.1.4 Summary
92(2)
3.2 The Hellenistic-Roman Period
94(26)
3.2.1 The general picture
94(1)
3.2.2 Innovative causative use of intransitive verbs: causativisation of intransitives vs. case changes in accusative verbs
94(12)
3.2.3 Transitivity alternation derivation and voice: changes towards marking of the anticausative with active voice
106(12)
3.2.4 Summary
118(2)
3.3 Medieval Greek
120(42)
3.3.1 The general picture
120(1)
3.3.2 Innovative causative use of intransitive verbs: is there a limit to causativisations?
121(9)
3.3.3 Derivation of transitivity alternations and voice: absorption of the accusative case by the non-active voice and tendency towards active causatives and anticausatives
130(22)
3.3.4 From Medieval to Modern Greek
152(9)
3.3.5 Summary
161(1)
3.4 Parallel Developments in the Diachrony of English and Romance
162(17)
3.4.1 Innovative causative use of intransitive verbs: direction of the changes
162(6)
3.4.2 Derivation of transitivity alternations and voice: morphological instability in transitivity alternations and differentiation between anticausative and passive
168(8)
3.4.3 Summary
176(3)
Chapter Four Diachronic Course and Derivation of Transitivity Alternations
179(38)
4.1 Reanalysis, Cues, and Causativisation
179(8)
4.1.1 Reanalysis of intransitive as transitive
179(4)
4.1.2 Cues for reanalysis
183(4)
4.2 The Role of Voice in Syntactic Changes
187(17)
4.2.1 The course and the interpretation of changes in voice
187(4)
4.2.2 Voice head, anticausative, and passive
191(9)
4.2.3 The feature [ non-act]
200(4)
4.3 Derivation of Transitivity Alternations: the Basic Causative Schema
204(9)
4.3.1 Basic schema of alternating verbs: previous analyses
204(2)
4.3.2 The proposed analysis
206(7)
4.4 Summary
213(4)
Chapter Five Conclusions
217(6)
Bibliography 223(34)
Index 257
Nikolaos Lavidas is Lecturer in Historical Linguistics at the Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, School of English, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Prior to his employment at the Aristotle University, he was a postdoctoral researcher at the University of the Aegean (with a scholarship from the Greek State Scholarship Foundation), and he taught Historical Linguistics at the University of Peloponnese, the University of Patras and the University of the Aegean. He has published articles on historical linguistics, more specifically on syntactic change, argument structure in diachrony, and Indo-European linguistics.
Biežāk uzdotie jautājumi par e-grāmatām Biežāk uzdotie jautājumi par e-grāmatām
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/97814438181002e.html
Keywords: