Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Understanding Forfeitures: an Analysis of the Relationship Between Case Details and Forfeiture Among TEOAF High-forfeiture and Major Cases [Mīkstie vāki]

  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 70 pages, height x width x depth: 283x217x5 mm, weight: 213 g, Illustrations
  • Izdošanas datums: 01-Jul-2009
  • Izdevniecība: RAND
  • ISBN-10: 0833046926
  • ISBN-13: 9780833046925
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 32,60 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 70 pages, height x width x depth: 283x217x5 mm, weight: 213 g, Illustrations
  • Izdošanas datums: 01-Jul-2009
  • Izdevniecība: RAND
  • ISBN-10: 0833046926
  • ISBN-13: 9780833046925
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
The Treasury Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture (TEOAF) administers the Treasury Forfeiture Fund (TFF), which is the receipt account for the deposits of nontax forfeitures that result from law-enforcement actions against criminal enterprises, such as drug cartels, terrorist organizations, and individual embezzlers, by agencies that are currently, or were historically, part of the U.S. Treasury -- the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation division, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and the U.S. Secret Service. High levels of forfeiture from the prosecution of these crimes serve to punish the individuals involved, help to dismantle the operations associated with the crime, may deter others from engaging in similar crimes, and provide funds to support future investigations among participating agencies. TEOAF commissioned the RAND Corporation to examine the relationship between targeted funding support of significant financial investigations and the forfeiture outcomes of such investigations. This report presents the findings of that analysis.

The Treasury Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture (TEOAF) administers the Treasury Forfeiture Fund (TFF), which receives deposits of nontax forfeitures made by current and former Treasury agencies. Participating agencies use TFF funds to disrupt and dismantle criminal enterprises. This report examines the relationship between targeted funding support of major financial investigations and the forfeiture outcomes of such investigations.
Preface iii
Figures
vii
Tables
ix
Summary xi
Acknowledgments xv
Abbreviations xvii
Introduction
1(6)
Background on TEOAF
1(2)
Agencies
2(1)
Major-Case Initiative
2(1)
Study Purpose and Methodology
3(3)
Purpose
3(1)
Methodology
4(2)
About This Report
6(1)
High-Forfeiture Cases
7(14)
Overview of High-Forfeiture Cases
7(2)
Analysis of High-Forfeiture Cases in the Database
9(1)
Data Limitations
10(1)
How to Read the Tables
10(1)
The Relationship Between Forfeitures and Characteristics of a Case
10(10)
Year
11(1)
Type of Case
11(3)
Field Office
14(1)
Hours
14(2)
Coordination with Other Agencies and Task Forces
16(1)
Use of Confidential Sources
17(1)
External Funding and Support
18(1)
Other Outputs
19(1)
Summary
20(1)
Major Cases
21(12)
Overview of Cases Receiving Major-Case Funding
22(1)
Analysis of Major Cases in the Database
23(1)
How to Read the Tables
23(1)
The Relationship Between Forfeitures and Characteristics of a Case
24(6)
Type and Level of Funding
24(2)
Year
26(1)
Type of Case
27(1)
Field Office
28(1)
Other Inputs and Activities
29(1)
Other Outputs
30(1)
Summary
30(3)
Recommendations for Major-Case Funding
33(6)
Awareness/Coordination
33(2)
Approval Process
35(1)
IRS-CI Cases
35(1)
USSS Cases
35(1)
Timing of Approval
36(1)
The Role of the Asset Forfeiture Coordinator
36(1)
Tracking and Reporting Requirements
36(3)
IRS-CI Cases
36(1)
USSS Cases
37(2)
Tracking Future Major Cases Through a Database
39(2)
Prototype Database
39(2)
Database Components
39(2)
Conclusion
41(10)
APPENDIXES
Interview Guide
43(4)
Analytic Framework
47(4)
References 51