|
|
x | |
Preface |
|
xi | |
|
1 User generated law: re-constructing intellectual property law in a knowledge society |
|
|
1 | (27) |
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
2 Private regulatory models and the fragmentation of law |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
3.1 Heterogeneous demands |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
3.2 Expectation of benefits (profits) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
3.3 Asymmetric information |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
3.4 The role of lead users |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (4) |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
|
12 | (10) |
|
5.1 Heterogeneous demands |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
5.2 Expectation of benefits |
|
|
14 | (4) |
|
5.3 Asymmetric information |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
5.4 The role of lead users |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
8 The international dimension |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
9 Prospects for a model on user generated law |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
2 Information abundance and knowledge commons |
|
|
28 | (27) |
|
|
|
28 | (5) |
|
2 Knowledge commons governance |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
3 An illustration: law itself as knowledge commons |
|
|
35 | (6) |
|
4 A research framework for understanding knowledge commons governance |
|
|
41 | (5) |
|
5 The knowledge commons research framework applied |
|
|
46 | (7) |
|
|
46 | (3) |
|
5.2 Best practices projects |
|
|
49 | (4) |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
3 Collective agreements for the clearance of copyrights -- the case of collective management and extended collective licences |
|
|
55 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
3 The extension effect (extended collective licences) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (8) |
|
|
59 | (3) |
|
4.2 Heterogeneous demands |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
4.3 Expectation of benefits |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
4.4 Asymmetric information |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
4.5 The role of lead users |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (4) |
|
5.1 Dissemination to other jurisdictions |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
5.2 Dissemination to other forms of uses |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
7 Perspectives and implications |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
4 Emerging models for cross-border online licensing |
|
|
77 | (22) |
|
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
2 Emerging licensing models -- stocktaking and outlook |
|
|
79 | (10) |
|
2.1 Model contracts as user generated law -- competition concerns and soft law |
|
|
79 | (4) |
|
2.2 Emergence of multi-territorial mono-repertoire direct licensing |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
2.3 Licensing hubs formed by author CMOs |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
2.4 Towards new players and (even more) direct licensing? |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
2.5 The operational picture |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
3 Assessment: the online music-licensing ecosystem as an example of user generated law |
|
|
89 | (8) |
|
3.1 Autonomy spaces and interdependencies between the licensing models |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
3.2 The emergence of cross-border models |
|
|
91 | (5) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
|
99 | (16) |
|
|
1 The legal protection of computer programs |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
|
101 | (8) |
|
2.1 History and philosophy of open source licences |
|
|
101 | (4) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
2.3 Open source licences and the practical use of open source software |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
2.4 The interplay between open source licences and copyright legislation |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
2.5 The legal status of open source licences -- contractual relationship? |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
3 Open source licences and the user generated law model |
|
|
109 | (4) |
|
|
109 | (3) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
6 IP coordination models: revealing some of the `magic' behind patent pools and clearinghouses? |
|
|
115 | (33) |
|
|
|
115 | (5) |
|
|
120 | (6) |
|
3 Main features of the user generated law model |
|
|
126 | (7) |
|
|
127 | (5) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
|
133 | (4) |
|
|
137 | (5) |
|
|
142 | (3) |
|
|
145 | (3) |
|
7 More competition-law-FRANDly IPR policies: a solution to SSOs' problems of self-governance? |
|
|
148 | (32) |
|
|
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
2 The standard setting landscape in the ICT sector |
|
|
150 | (9) |
|
2.1 New research perspectives on standardization |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
2.2 Standards and standardization in the ICT sector |
|
|
152 | (4) |
|
2.3 Nature and challenges of standard setting organizations |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
|
159 | (9) |
|
3.1 Overview of the role of IPRs in the ICT sector |
|
|
159 | (3) |
|
3.2 IPR policy of SSOs as a matter of commons governance |
|
|
162 | (3) |
|
3.3 Patent disclosure policy and licensing commitments |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
4 Overview of Competition Law Practice |
|
|
168 | (7) |
|
4.1 Competition law's treatment of SSO activity as horizontal cooperation |
|
|
168 | (4) |
|
4.2 Competition law's treatment of patent holdups through a breach of FRAND commitments |
|
|
172 | (3) |
|
|
175 | (4) |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
8 `The rise of standardisation and the limits of self-governance': unilateral conduct under international standards from an EU competition law perspective |
|
|
180 | (26) |
|
|
|
180 | (2) |
|
2 The Orange-Book-Standard case and beyond |
|
|
182 | (4) |
|
3 The EU Commission's investigations |
|
|
186 | (5) |
|
4 The opinion of the Advocate General in Huawei |
|
|
191 | (6) |
|
5 The ECJ's judgment in Huawei |
|
|
197 | (5) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
7 User generated law model |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (2) |
|
9 The private legal governance of domain names |
|
|
206 | (22) |
|
|
|
206 | (3) |
|
2 The institutional framework for dispute resolution of domain names |
|
|
209 | (8) |
|
|
209 | (4) |
|
|
213 | (3) |
|
2.3 Perspectives and implications |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
3 Substantive law conflicts: use of trademark in a domain name to express criticism |
|
|
217 | (8) |
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
|
219 | (3) |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
3.4 Perspectives and implications |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
4 Reflection: domain names and user generated law |
|
|
225 | (3) |
|
10 Private enforcement of IP law by internet service providers: notice and action procedures |
|
|
228 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
2 Emergence of N&A Procedures |
|
|
229 | (7) |
|
2.1 The autonomy spaces: standards of liability for ISPs |
|
|
229 | (3) |
|
2.2 Heterogeneous demands |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
2.3 Expectation of benefits |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
2.4 Asymmetric information |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
|
236 | (3) |
|
|
239 | (11) |
|
4.1 Significance of N&A procedures |
|
|
239 | (2) |
|
4.2 Problems related to N&A procedures |
|
|
241 | (6) |
|
4.3 Adoption: legislative correction of autonomy spaces? |
|
|
247 | (3) |
|
|
250 | (2) |
Bibliography |
|
252 | (19) |
Index |
|
271 | |