|
|
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Definition of watershed health |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
The foundation of watershed management: A lead group and a plan |
|
|
7 | (4) |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
The watershed management model |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
The Closed-Loop Watershed Health Monitoring Model |
|
|
11 | (4) |
|
Political linkages and support |
|
|
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
Creating political linkages |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
|
20 | (7) |
|
|
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Surveillance and performance evaluation |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
The three-tiered surface water assessment model |
|
|
28 | (24) |
|
|
30 | (3) |
|
Tier 1: Biological assessment approaches |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
Multivariate statistics and the reference condition approach |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Tier 2: Water chemistry and habitat assessment |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
Water chemistry approaches |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
Tier 3: Toxic contaminant sampling |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
Common Toxic contaminants in surface waters |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
Contaminant sampling issues and techniques |
|
|
45 | (5) |
|
Multiple regression, a correlative and predictive tool |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
Data quality assurance and control |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
|
55 | (6) |
|
Community education and awareness |
|
|
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
Techniques for educating the watershed community |
|
|
62 | (4) |
|
Community-based monitoring |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
Media coverage, marketing, and promotion |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Utilization of community organizations and service groups |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Computers and the Internet |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (5) |
|
Cost recovery through partnership |
|
|
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
A cost recovery and partnering model |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
|
74 | (8) |
Case Study 1: The Laurel Creek Watershed Monitoring Program |
|
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
Task team development and partnerships |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (4) |
|
System monitoring (watershed-wide area) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
Development monitoring (development-specific area) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
Stage I monitoring (preconstruction) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
Stage II monitoring (during construction) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Stage III monitoring (postconstruction) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Postdevelopment monitoring (watershed-wide area) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Estimated annual program budget |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Recent program development |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Supporting watershed documents |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
The Laurel Creek Watershed Study |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Winning the 1998 Dubai International Award for Best Practices |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (4) |
Case Study 2: Developing an environmental monitoring program for the Uxbridge Brook Watershed |
|
|
Uxbridge Brook Watershed Plan |
|
|
99 | (4) |
|
Monitoring activities used to develop the Uxbridge Brook Watershed Plan |
|
|
103 | (7) |
|
Monitoring implementation of the Uxbridge Brook Watershed Plan |
|
|
110 | (9) |
|
Surveillance monitoring activities |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
Cost recovery, data management, and communication |
|
|
114 | (5) |
Case Study 3: Integrated Stormwater and Watershed Management System --- An emerging tool for watershed health planning and monitoring |
|
|
|
119 | (4) |
|
Developing subwatershed plans and monitoring programs using the Integrated Stormwater and Watershed Management System |
|
|
123 | (11) |
|
Objectives and case study locations |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
Overview of ISWMS software |
|
|
125 | (5) |
|
Applying ISWMS in the Blue Mountain and Beaver Valley region, Ontario |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
Watershed management and flood forecasting |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Groundwater management and water balance monitoring |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Case study project participants |
|
|
135 | (4) |
Case Study 4: Advanced remote sensing technologies for watershed health monitoring |
|
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
Recent advances in remote sensing |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Use of radar satellite data for watershed health monitoring |
|
|
141 | (6) |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
Location of pilot project watershed |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
Use of LIDAR data for watershed health monitoring |
|
|
147 | (6) |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
The Foster Creek LIDAR Pilot Project |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
Case study project partners |
|
|
153 | (4) |
Case Study 5: The Lake Simcoe environmental management strategy |
|
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (4) |
|
|
162 | (4) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
Lake Simcoe Fisheries Assessment Unit |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
166 | (3) |
|
Developing a phosphorus-loading objective |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
Producing a management strategy |
|
|
169 | (5) |
|
Examples of adaptive management in the LSEMS Implementation Program |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
Assessing the effectiveness of remedial efforts |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
Community education and awareness |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
Cost recovery and partnerships |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
|
178 | (3) |
Case Study 6: Applying the Closed-Loop Model to improve water quality in the Yuqiao Reservoir, Tianjin, China |
|
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
The public-participatory process: A means to building consensus |
|
|
182 | (5) |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
Developing the project goal and objective |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
Defining the study area and pilot projects |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
Identifying objectives for involving the public |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Obstacles and benefits of using a public-participatory approach to control pollution |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Identifying the stakeholders |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
Outlining methods of public participation |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Producing a public-participation action plan |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Achieving success: Putting the plans into action |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
Lessons learned and the continued application of the public-participation process in China |
|
|
189 | (4) |
Glossary |
|
193 | (10) |
References |
|
203 | (12) |
Index |
|
215 | |