|
|
vii | |
|
|
viii | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (6) |
|
The argument and contribution of the book |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
The structure of the book |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
1 Transition from democratic rule: a theoretical overview |
|
|
7 | (19) |
|
The emergence of a research agenda |
|
|
7 | (5) |
|
The first, second, and ...? Historical reverse waves and a fragmented literature |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
From the conditions for the transition from democratic rule ... |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
... to the role of the actors in the processes |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
Conclusion: toward a comprehensive approach? |
|
|
19 | (7) |
|
2 The reverse process in the contemporary period: a preliminary assessment |
|
|
26 | (24) |
|
Democracy indices in a comparative perspective |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
Different indices, similar trends? |
|
|
29 | (15) |
|
Comparing the findings: a global picture |
|
|
44 | (6) |
|
3 Focusing on the conditions: a Qualitative Comparative Analysis |
|
|
50 | (30) |
|
Combining the contextual and proximate conditions for the transition from democracy |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the study of the transition from democracy |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
Calibration of the outcome and of the conditions |
|
|
55 | (11) |
|
|
66 | (5) |
|
Concluding and moving ahead: post-QCA case studies |
|
|
71 | (9) |
|
4 Incumbent entrenchment: Dominican Republic and Bolivia |
|
|
80 | (20) |
|
Dominican Republic: "the shadow of the (near) past" |
|
|
80 | (7) |
|
Bolivia: "under (social) pressure" |
|
|
87 | (7) |
|
Conclusion: incumbent entrenchment as a model of transition |
|
|
94 | (6) |
|
5 Opposition takeover: Venezuela and Gambia |
|
|
100 | (17) |
|
Venezuela: "too much oil will kill you" |
|
|
100 | (7) |
|
The Gambia: (they can't get no) satisfaction |
|
|
107 | (6) |
|
Conclusion: opposition takeover as a model of transition |
|
|
113 | (4) |
|
6 Democratic coup: Nigeria and Thailand |
|
|
117 | (19) |
|
Nigeria: all by ourselves, we want to be, all by ourselves |
|
|
117 | (6) |
|
Thailand: the times they are (not) a-changin' |
|
|
123 | (8) |
|
Conclusion: democratic coup as a model of transition |
|
|
131 | (5) |
|
7 Stabilizing coup: Mali and Turkey |
|
|
136 | (19) |
|
Mali: "(they) got their finger on the trigger, but (they) don't know who to trust" |
|
|
136 | (7) |
|
Turkey: "all we need is just a little (im)patience" |
|
|
143 | (7) |
|
Conclusion: stabilizing coup as a model of transition |
|
|
150 | (5) |
|
8 Conclusions: when democracies collapse |
|
|
155 | (18) |
|
Putting the pieces together: the four models of transition |
|
|
157 | (4) |
|
Mutually reinforcing inequalities |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
Crises and the role of the actors |
|
|
163 | (4) |
|
What is left unexplained ... and the future perspectives for research |
|
|
167 | (6) |
Index |
|
173 | |