Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Changes in Argument Structure: The Transitivizing Reaction Object Construction

  • Formāts: PDF+DRM
  • Sērija : Linguistic Insights 277
  • Izdošanas datums: 24-Jun-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9783034342650
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 55,99 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: PDF+DRM
  • Sērija : Linguistic Insights 277
  • Izdošanas datums: 24-Jun-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9783034342650
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

This book deals with the characterization and history of the reaction object construction (ROC), as in Pauline smiled her thanks. The ROC consists of an intransitive verb followed by a nonprototypical object that expresses a reaction such that the whole syntactic unit acquires the extended meaning "express X by V-ing" (e.g. "Pauline expressed her thanks by smiling"). The hypothesis is put forward that ROCs follow a similar pathway as other valency-increasing constructions such as the cognate object construction and the way-construction, occurring first with more transitive-like verbs and then expanding to intransitives. Historical corpus evidence from several complementary data sources confirms this idea and reveals striking parallelisms with the way-construction.









"This is an unusually clear and empirically rich study which uses an overlooked construction in English to explore a broader development in the grammar and to engage with current trends in theoretical linguistics." Olaf Mikkelsen (University of Paris 8) in Nexus-AEDEAN 22/2 (2022): 88.















"This is a thought-provoking and empirically rich study, which sheds new light on an overlooked construction and its history. One gets the sense that few stones have been left unturned in Bousos work on the ROC. The review of the existing literature on the construction is very comprehensive, and the book contains more than 450 numbered examples in total, so it may be used both as a bibliography of earlier work and a handy data source for other scholars interested in the ROC. [ ] One very attractive aspect of the book is that it paves the way for future studies in numerous respects." Sune Gregersen (Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, U. de Copenhagen) in Research in Corpus Linguistics 10/1 (2022): 197-201.









"The monograph 'Changes in Argument Structure' is a well-documented, rigorous study that will be enjoyed by both experts and novice researchers interested in the history of the English reaction object construction. The strengths of the book are the originality of an uncharted area in historical linguistics, the exploration and comparison of the development of the ROC in two varieties of English, namely British and American, the parallelism between the ROC and other constructions of the English language, such as the way-construction, and the use of a complex methodological perspective (e.g. collexeme analysis as well as several statistical tests)." Andreea Rosca (Universitat de Valčncia) in Miscelįnea: A Journal of English and American Studies 69 (2024): 245-248.









"The study clearly achieves its goal of providing a meticulous and convincing application of by now rather standard concepts in Construction Grammar to a particular, to-date unexplored phenomenon. (...)". It "constitutes a great contribution to the growing body of (diachronic) Construction Grammar, and a model illustration of how constructionist thinking can be used for the characterisation and tracking of peculiar but thought provoking linguistic patterns." Eva Zehentner (University of Zurich) in English Language and Linguistics (2025): 1-7; Published online by Cambridge University Press.
List of Abbreviations
11(4)
1 Introduction
15(18)
1.1 Aims and scope
15(10)
1.2 Research questions and hypotheses
25(3)
1.3 Overview of the following chapters
28(5)
PART I Transitivization, Reaction Objects and Construction Grammar
2 The Process Of Transitivization In The History Of English
33(24)
2.1 Old and Modern English valency
33(7)
2.2 The rise of double-functioned or amphibious verbs
40(4)
2.3 Causes of the process of transitivization: Visser's proposal
44(11)
2.3.1 Loss of OE transitivizing/causativizing affixes (be-, ge-, Gmc -jl-i)
45(1)
2.3.1.1 The prefix be- (Marchand 1969)
45(2)
2.3.1.2 The prefix ge- (Lindemann 1970)
47(1)
2.3.1.3 The Germanic suffix *-(i)ja- (Garcia Garcia 2012)
48(2)
2.3.2 Inflectional syncretism followed by reanalysis of the dative/genitive complement
50(2)
2.3.3 Twofold interpretation of be + past participle: Perfect and passive
52(2)
2.3.4 Changes in the complementation patterns of intransitive verbs normally construed with a prepositional object
54(1)
2.3.5 Use of verbs expressing human and animal sounds and other verbs such as smirk, smile and persist as if they were synonyms of say
54(1)
2.4 Summary
55(2)
3 Reaction Objects: Review Of The Literature
57(42)
3.1 The object in descriptive reference grammars
57(21)
3.1.1 Historical grammars
57(1)
3.1.1.1 Otto Jespersen (1909--1949)
57(11)
3.1.1.2 F. Th. Visser (1963--1973)
68(3)
3.1.2 Contemporary grammars
71(1)
3.1.2.1 Quirk et al. (1985)
71(2)
3.1.2.2 Huddleston and Pullum et al. (2002)
73(4)
3.1.3 Interim summary
77(1)
3.2 Reaction object constructions and other related object types
78(21)
3.2.1 Nonprototypical objects
81(1)
3.2.1.1 Cognate objects
81(2)
3.2.1.2 Way-objects
83(6)
3.2.1.3 Reaction objects
89(8)
3.2.2 Concluding remarks
97(2)
4 Construction Grammar: Synchronic And Diachronic Perspectives
99(28)
4.1 Cognitive Linguistics and Construction Grammar
99(2)
4.2 The origins of Construction Grammar
101(4)
4.2.1 From idioms to Construction Grammar
101(4)
4.3 Construction grammars: Common grounds
105(8)
4.3.1 Grammatical constructions
105(3)
4.3.2 Surface generalizations
108(1)
4.3.3 A network of constructions
109(1)
4.3.4 Crosslinguistic variability and generalization
110(1)
4.3.5 Usage-based
111(2)
4.4 Construction Grammar and language change
113(9)
4.4.1 Defining constructional change
113(4)
4.4.2 Dynamic network of constructions: Links, gains, losses and reconfigurations
117(5)
4.5 Concluding remarks
122(5)
PART II Hands-On with Data: A Usage-Based Approach to the History of the ROC
5 The Formation Of Rocs
127(78)
5.1 Characterization of the ROC
127(22)
5.1.1 The modern reaction object construction: An overview
127(12)
5.1.2 The reaction object construction in the network of English constructions
139(10)
5.2 On the emergence of the ROC
149(56)
5.2.1 Data sources
149(1)
5.2.1.1 Jespersen (1909--1949)
149(1)
5.2.1.2 Visser (1963--1973)
149(3)
5.2.1.3 Levin (1993)
152(2)
5.2.2 Methodology
154(32)
5.2.3 Results
186(9)
5.2.3.1 The ROC and the cognate object construction
195(4)
5.2.3.2 The ROC and the way-construction
199(4)
5.2.3.3 The ROC and the dummy it object construction
203(1)
5.2.4 Concluding remarks
204(1)
6 Development Of The Roc In British English
205(64)
6.1 Data sources and methodology
206(7)
6.2 Frequency of occurrence and prototypical verbs in the construction
213(11)
6.2.1 A collexeme analysis of ROCs: Identifying typical verbs in the construction
216(1)
6.2.1.1 Some methodological considerations
216(3)
6.2.1.2 Results and discussion
219(4)
6.2.1.3 Summary
223(1)
6.3 Distribution and function
224(45)
6.3.1 Distribution of reaction objects across verb classes
224(1)
6.3.1.1 Verbs of manner of speaking
224(13)
6.3.1.2 Verbs of nonverbal communication
237(2)
6.3.1.2.1 The verb smile
239(4)
6.3.1.2.2 The verb nod
243(1)
6.3.1.2.3 The verbs wave, frown, snort and wink
244(2)
6.3.1.2.4 The verbs sigh, sob, weep, grin and laugh
246(2)
6.3.1.2.5 Structural variation with nod and wave
248(6)
6.3.2 Diachronic distribution
254(1)
6.3.3 Textual distribution
255(1)
6.3.3.1 Drama
255(5)
6.3.3.2 Narrative fiction
260(4)
6.3.4 Concluding remarks
264(5)
7 Development Of The Roc In American English
269(38)
7.1 Data sources and methodology
270(14)
7.2 Frequency and distribution
284(3)
7.3 Productivity of the ROC and the way-construction
287(20)
8 Summary And Conclusion
307(20)
8.1 The reaction object construction
307(1)
8.2 Summary of the book
308(6)
8.3 Writing the history of the ROC: A proposal of when, how and why the ROC develops
314(6)
8.4 Theoretical implications and suggestions for further research
320(7)
List of Figures 327(4)
List of Tables 331(4)
Summary 335(2)
List of References 337(32)
Author's Bio 369
Tamara Bouso holds a PhD in English linguistics from the University of Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Her research interests include language variation and change, (Diachronic) Construction Grammar, and transitivization processes in the history of English.