Preface |
|
xi | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xiii | |
|
Chapter 1 The Category of That-less clauses |
|
|
3 | (8) |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
2.1 An Answer: the CP-Hypothesis |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
2.2 An Answer: the IP-Hypothesis |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Chapter 2 Argument Clauses |
|
|
11 | (46) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
2 Arguments for The IP-Hypothesis |
|
|
12 | (6) |
|
2.1 Embedded Topicalization |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
2.3 Adjunction Evidence: Summary |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
3 The Ecp Account of the Distribution of That-Less Clauses |
|
|
18 | (15) |
|
3.1 The Government Requirement |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
3.2 Explaining the Government Requirement |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
3.2.1 C0 to V0 Incorporation |
|
|
20 | (4) |
|
3.2.2 Head Government at Phonological Form |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
3.3.1 Embedded Sentential Subjects |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
3.3.2 Ungoverned Null Complementizers |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
4 Explaining the Distribution of IP |
|
|
33 | (7) |
|
4.1 Previous Accounts: Webelhuth 1992 |
|
|
34 | (4) |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
6 Appendix: Lexical Restrictions |
|
|
41 | (16) |
|
6.1 Paradox: Selected Adjunct Clauses |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
|
44 | (4) |
|
6.3 Noun Complement Clauses |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
50 | (7) |
|
Chapter 3 Relative Clauses |
|
|
57 | |
|
|
57 | (5) |
|
1.1 Syntactic Properties of Contact Clauses |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
1.2 Restrictive Relative Clauses: Assumptions |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
2 The Structure of Contact Clauses |
|
|
62 | (9) |
|
2.1 Contact Clauses are IP |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
2.2 The A'-Chain in Contact Clauses |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
2.2.7 The Null Operator Approach |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Proposal: A'-Chains without Movement |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
2.3 The Adjacency Restriction |
|
|
67 | (3) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
3 Subject Contact Clauses |
|
|
71 | (18) |
|
3.1 Distribution: The Majority Dialect |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
3.2 Subject Contact Clauses as non-Relative Clauses |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
3.2.1 Independent Evidence for the Pseudo-Relative |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
3.2.2 Subject Contact Clauses as Pseudo-Relatives |
|
|
77 | (4) |
|
3.3 Subject Contact Clauses are Relative Clauses |
|
|
81 | (6) |
|
3.4 Distribution: Liberal Dialects |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
4 Explaining the Distribution of Subject Contact Clauses |
|
|
89 | |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
4.2 The Distribution of Post-Nominal Modifiers |
|
|
92 | (3) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
95 | |
|
Chapter 4 Extraction Theory |
|
|
3 | (122) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
|
106 | (9) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
3.1.1 Locality as Binding |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
3.1.2 Locality as Antecedent Government |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
3.2 The Head-Government Account |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Advantages of the Account |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
4 Implications for Head-Government |
|
|
115 | (6) |
|
4.1 Null Complementizers are Inert for Government |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (3) |
|
|
121 | (4) |
|
|
122 | (3) |
|
Chapter 5 Concluding Remarks |
|
|
125 | (6) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
2 Distribution of Non-Root IP |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
3 Extension to Bare Infinitives |
|
|
127 | (4) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
Bibliography |
|
131 | (8) |
Index |
|
139 | |