|
1 Examining the Phenomenon: The Link Between Migration and Climate Change |
|
|
1 | (38) |
|
|
1.1 Internal Forced Climate Migration in Mexico |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
1.2 Typology: Six Scenarios that Generate Climate Internal Forced Migration |
|
|
3 | (8) |
|
1.2.1 Sudden-Onset Disasters |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.2.2 Slow-Onset Phenomena |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
1.2.3 "Sinking" Islands and Coasts |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.2.4 Areas Designated Unsuitable for Human Settlement |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
1.2.5 Conflicts or Violence Caused by the Scarcity of Natural Resources |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
1.2.6 "Development Projects" Related to Renewable Energies |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1.3 Particularly Vulnerable Populations |
|
|
11 | (7) |
|
1.3.1 People with Limited Economic Resources |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
1.4 Definition and Criteria |
|
|
18 | (9) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (5) |
|
1.4.3 Criteria to Assess the Forced Character |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
|
27 | (12) |
|
|
28 | (11) |
|
2 Analytical Grid: Territory and Human Rights |
|
|
39 | (54) |
|
|
2.1 The Territory: Elements of Analysis and Challenges |
|
|
39 | (9) |
|
2.1.1 Notion of Territory |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.1.2 The Territory as a Unit of Analysis |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
2.1.3 Challenges for Origin and Destination Territories |
|
|
42 | (4) |
|
2.1.4 Particular Challenges for Cities and Indigenous Peoples |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
2.2 Introduction to the Protection Requirements |
|
|
48 | (4) |
|
2.2.1 Challenges When Establishing the Protection Requirements |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
2.2.2 Deficiencies Within the International and Regional Legal Panorama |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
2.3 The Differentiated Rights-Based Approach |
|
|
52 | (20) |
|
2.3.1 A Rights-Based Approach |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
2.3.2 A Differentiated Approach |
|
|
54 | (8) |
|
|
62 | (10) |
|
2.4 An Environmental Rights Approach |
|
|
72 | (9) |
|
2.4.1 Contributions of Environmental Rights to the Protection Requirements |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
2.4.2 Environmental Rights: Content and Legal Foundations |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
2.4.3 Environmental Rights' Potential: A Panorama |
|
|
77 | (4) |
|
|
81 | (12) |
|
|
82 | (11) |
|
3 Shortcomings of Legal Frameworks and Public Policies |
|
|
93 | (52) |
|
|
3.1 State-of-the-Art: The Shortcomings of Current Academic Knowledge |
|
|
93 | (3) |
|
3.2 Deficiencies in the Mexican Legislative Framework |
|
|
96 | (18) |
|
3.2.1 Critical Analysis of Mexican Norms at Federal Level |
|
|
96 | (9) |
|
3.2.2 Shortcomings of the 2020 Draft General Law to Prevent, Address, and Comprehensively Repair Internal Displacement |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
3.2.3 Critical Assessment of the Legislative Frameworks at State Level: Chiapas and Guerrero |
|
|
109 | (5) |
|
3.3 Public Policy Instruments: Main Shortcomings |
|
|
114 | (17) |
|
3.3.1 National Instruments That Address Climate Change |
|
|
114 | (10) |
|
3.3.2 Federal Planning Instruments: Territorial and Ecological Development and Planning |
|
|
124 | (4) |
|
3.3.3 The Specific Case of Federal Instruments that Address Sudden-Onset Disasters |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
|
131 | (14) |
|
|
137 | (8) |
|
4 Shortcomings at the Sub-national Level: Illustration with the State of Tabasco |
|
|
145 | (38) |
|
|
|
4.1 Sub-national Public Policy Instruments and Internal Forced Climate Mobility: A Critical Stance |
|
|
146 | (6) |
|
4.1.1 Climate Policy Instruments |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
4.1.2 Territorial and Ecological Planning |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
4.1.3 State Development Plan 2019-2024 |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
4.1.4 Risk Management Instruments |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
4.2 The 2007 Flood and Women in the Centra Municipality |
|
|
152 | (10) |
|
4.2.1 Presentation of the 2007 Flood and 2011 Operational Guidelines |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
4.2.2 Diagnosis of the Centra Municipality's Instruments |
|
|
154 | (3) |
|
4.2.3 Case Study: The 2007 Flood |
|
|
157 | (5) |
|
4.3 Sea-Level Rise Scenario and Chontal People in the Centla Municipality |
|
|
162 | (13) |
|
|
162 | (6) |
|
4.3.2 Shortcomings of Municipal Instruments |
|
|
168 | (7) |
|
|
175 | (8) |
|
|
176 | (7) |
|
5 Addressing the Phenomenon in Mexico: Risks from the Protection Requirements Perspective |
|
|
183 | (22) |
|
|
5.1 Recognizing Forced Internal Climate Migrants |
|
|
184 | (2) |
|
5.1.1 The Necessary Recognition |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
5.1.2 Risks Associated with the Recognition |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
5.2 Facilitating and Organizing the Relocation of Migrants |
|
|
186 | (8) |
|
5.2.1 Relocation and Climate Mobility Scenarios |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 Risks Associated with Forced Relocation |
|
|
187 | (3) |
|
5.2.3 Very High Risks in Mexico |
|
|
190 | (4) |
|
5.3 Preventive and Reactive Adaptation Measures |
|
|
194 | (7) |
|
5.3.1 Resilience Strengthening to Prevent Mobility |
|
|
194 | (5) |
|
5.3.2 Celebrating Forced Mobility as a Successful Reactive Adaptation |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
5.4 Initial Thoughts on How to Overcome the Risks and Articulate the Solutions |
|
|
201 | (3) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
References |
|
205 | (10) |
General Conclusion |
|
215 | |