|
|
xi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xiii | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (9) |
|
Defining the symphony orchestra |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
|
5 | (5) |
|
1 Symphony orchestras in Europe |
|
|
10 | (28) |
|
The orchestra and its repertoire |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
The heroic rise of the symphony orchestra |
|
|
11 | (6) |
|
The orchestra and its canon |
|
|
17 | (4) |
|
The impact of legitimacy pressures |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Financial precariousness of the orchestra |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
The adoption of a dominant logic |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
The compromise of the musical canon |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
The hybridization of the aesthetic |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
The sustainable symphony orchestra |
|
|
32 | (6) |
|
2 Orchestra management in Flanders: the struggle for artistic territory |
|
|
38 | (48) |
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
Antwerp Symphony Orchestra |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
A brief history of the Antwerp Symphony Orchestra |
|
|
42 | (3) |
|
Business model of the Antwerp Symphony Orchestra |
|
|
45 | (4) |
|
Programming policy of the Antwerp Symphony Orchestra |
|
|
49 | (10) |
|
Strengths and limitations of the ASO model |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
Foundational principles of Casco Phil |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
Business model of Casco Phil |
|
|
62 | (6) |
|
Programming policy of Casco Phil |
|
|
68 | (9) |
|
Strengths and limitations of the Casco Phil model |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Marking artistic territory in Flanders |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
The division of subsidies |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
The division of repertoires |
|
|
81 | (5) |
|
3 Music organizations in Amsterdam: divide and create |
|
|
86 | (52) |
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
Royal Concertgebouworkest |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
A brief history of the Concertgebouworkest |
|
|
90 | (6) |
|
Business model of the Concertgebouworkest |
|
|
96 | (6) |
|
Programming policy of the Concertgebouworkest |
|
|
102 | (16) |
|
Strengths and limitations of the RCO model |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Foundational principles of Splendor |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Business model of Splendor |
|
|
121 | (5) |
|
Programming policy of Splendor |
|
|
126 | (4) |
|
Strengths and limitations of the Splendor model |
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
Restoring the symmetries in Amsterdam |
|
|
132 | (6) |
|
4 The Anglo-Saxon orchestra model: Creative Darwinism in London |
|
|
138 | (55) |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
London Symphony Orchestra |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
A brief history of London Symphony Orchestra |
|
|
141 | (6) |
|
Business model of London Symphony Orchestra |
|
|
147 | (6) |
|
Programming policy of London Symphony Orchestra |
|
|
153 | (11) |
|
Strengths and limitations of the LSO model |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
The history of Aurora Orchestra |
|
|
166 | (3) |
|
Business model of Aurora Orchestra |
|
|
169 | (6) |
|
Programming policy of Aurora Orchestra |
|
|
175 | (10) |
|
Strengths and limitations of the Aurora Orchestra model |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
Between commercialism and artistry in London |
|
|
187 | (6) |
|
5 Artistic innovation through orchestra models |
|
|
193 | (46) |
|
Comparing orchestra models |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
Organizational parameters |
|
|
195 | (5) |
|
|
200 | (8) |
|
Design principles of alternative orchestra models |
|
|
208 | (3) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Factors impacting programming |
|
|
211 | (3) |
|
|
214 | (5) |
|
|
219 | (7) |
|
Conclusion: models and repertoires for the symphony orchestra |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Challenging the dominant logic |
|
|
226 | (4) |
|
Interlocking value cycles |
|
|
230 | (9) |
Index |
|
239 | |