Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Patent Remedies and Complex Products: Toward a Global Consensus [Hardback]

Edited by , Edited by , Edited by , Edited by
  • Formāts: Hardback, 376 pages, height x width x depth: 235x157x25 mm, weight: 650 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Izdošanas datums: 27-Jun-2019
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1108426751
  • ISBN-13: 9781108426756
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 152,25 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 376 pages, height x width x depth: 235x157x25 mm, weight: 650 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Izdošanas datums: 27-Jun-2019
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1108426751
  • ISBN-13: 9781108426756
Through a collaboration among twenty legal scholars from eleven countries in North America, Europe and Asia, Patent Remedies and Complex Products presents an international consensus on the use of patent remedies for complex products such as smartphones, computer networks and the Internet of Things. It covers the application of both monetary remedies like reasonable royalties, lost profits, and enhanced damages, as well as injunctive relief. Readers will also learn about the effect of competition laws and agreements to license standards-essential patents on terms that are 'fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory' (FRAND) on patent remedies. Where national values and policy make consensus difficult, contributors discuss the nature and direction of further research required to resolve disagreements. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

Papildus informācija

An international consensus approach to patent remedies treating complex products such as smartphones, computer networks, and the Internet of Things. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
List of Contributors xi
Foreword xxi
Kathleen M. O'Malley
Preface and Acknowledgments xxiii
Executive Summary xxvi
Introduction 1(5)
1 Reasonable Royalties 6(44)
Thomas F. Cotter
John M. Golden
Oskar Liivak
Brian J. Love
Norman V. Siebrasse
Masabumi Suzuki
David O. Taylor
1.1 Preliminary Matters
6(7)
1.1.1 Empirical Literature
6(2)
1.1.2 Theoretical Justifications
8(3)
1.1.3 Principal Approaches
11(2)
1.2 Reformulating Georgia-Pacific
13(6)
1.3 Incremental Value and Other Issues
19(27)
1.3.1 Incremental Value
19(3)
1.3.2 Hypothetical Bargain
22(1)
1.3.3 Dividing Incremental Value
23(5)
1.3.4 Timing of Hypothetical Negotiation
28(2)
1.3.5 Information Set
30(3)
1.3.6 Comparable Licenses
33(8)
1.3.7 Entire Market Value Rule and Smallest Saleable Unit
41(5)
1.4 Practical Considerations
46(4)
1.4.1 Expert Evidence and Daubert Gatekeeping in the United States
47(1)
1.4.2 "Kickers" for Reasonable Royalties
48(1)
1.4.3 Calibrated Evidentiary Burdens or Royalty Measures
49(1)
2 Lost Profits and Disgorgement 50(40)
Christopher B. Seaman
Thomas F. Cotter
Brian J. Love
Norman V. Siebrasse
Masabumi Suzuki
2.1 Introduction
50(1)
2.2 Lost Profits
51(21)
2.2.1 Introduction
51(1)
2.2.2 Specific Issues Regarding Lost Profits
52(20)
2.3 Disgorgement of Infringer's Profit
72(18)
2.3.1 Theoretical Justifications
72(2)
2.3.2 Comparative Approaches to Disgorgement
74(6)
2.3.3 Specific Issues Regarding Disgorgement
80(10)
3 Enhanced Damages, Litigation Cost Recovery, and Interest 90(25)
Colleen V. Chien
Jorge L. Contreras
Thomas F. Cotter
Brian J. Love
Christopher B. Seaman
Norman V. Siebrasse
3.1 Introduction
90(1)
3.2 Enhanced Damages
91(13)
3.2.1 Approaches to Enhanced Damages
91(5)
3.2.2 Criminal Sanctions
96(1)
3.2.3 Policy Considerations Relating to Enhanced Damages
97(6)
3.2.4 Recommendations and Further Research
103(1)
3.3 Litigation Cost Recovery
104(7)
3.3.1 Approaches to Litigation Cost Recovery
104(4)
3.3.2 Economic Theory and Empirical Research on the Effects of Cost Recovery
108(2)
3.3.3 Recommendations for Best Practices and Future Research
110(1)
3.4 Pre- and Post-judgment Interest
111(4)
3.4.1 Approaches in Selected Countries
111(3)
3.4.2 Recommendations for Best Practices and Future Research
114(1)
4 Injunctive Relief 115(45)
Norman V. Siebrasse
Rafal Sikorski
Jorge L. Contreras
Thomas F. Cotter
John Golden
Sang o Jon
Brian J. Love
David O. Taylor
4.1 Introduction
115(1)
4.2 Theory
115(10)
4.2.1 Nature of Patent Rights and Injunctions
115(3)
4.2.2 Economic Analysis and Complex Products
118(4)
4.2.3 Preliminary v. Permanent Injunctions
122(3)
4.3 Comparative Overview of Injunction Practices
125(19)
4.3.1 Overview
125(2)
4.3.2 United States
127(7)
4.3.3 England
134(7)
4.3.4 Civil Law Systems
141(2)
4.3.5 International Context and TRIPS
143(1)
4.4 Recommendations
144(16)
4.4.1 Basic Principles for Injunctive Relief
144(1)
4.4.2 Proportionality
145(10)
4.4.3 Tailoring Injunctive Relief
155(2)
4.4.4 Ongoing Royalty in Lieu of Injunctive Relief
157(3)
5 The Effect of FRAND Commitments on Patent Remedies 160(42)
Jorge L. Contreras
Thomas F. Cotter
Sang Jo Jong
Brian J. Love
Nicolas Petit
Peter Picht
Norman V. Siebrasse
Rafal Sikorski
Masabumi Suzuki
Jacques de Werra
5.1 Introduction
160(1)
5.2 FRAND Commitments and Monetary Patent Damages
161(10)
5.2.1 United States
162(3)
5.2.2 European Union - Applicability of Huawei v. ZTE to Monetary Remedies
165(1)
5.2.3 National Damages Laws
166(1)
5.2.4 Discussion and Analysis: Monetary Damages and FRAND
167(4)
5.3 FRAND Commitments and Injunctive Relief
171(20)
5.3.1 United States
171(4)
5.3.2 European Union
175(10)
5.3.3 Korea
185(1)
5.3.4 Japan
185(2)
5.3.5 China
187(1)
5.3.6 Discussion and Analysis: FRAND and Injunctions
188(3)
Appendix National Law Considerations for Monetary FRAND Damages
191(11)
A Germany
191(2)
B Switzerland
193(6)
C Korea
199(1)
D Japan
200(1)
E China
200(2)
6 The Effect of Competition Law on Patent Remedies 202(37)
Alison Jones
Renato Nazzini
6.1 Introduction
202(2)
6.2 Objectives of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
204(5)
6.3 Antitrust Liability for Enforcement or Exploitation of Patents
209(23)
6.3.1 Background
209(2)
6.3.2 Antitrust Limits on a Patent Holder Seeking Restorative Patent Remedies (and Judicial Exploitation of Patents)
211(8)
6.3.3 Antitrust Limits on the Commercial Exploitation of Patents
219(13)
6.4 Antitrust Remedies
232(4)
6.5 Conclusions
236(3)
7 Holdup, Holdout, and Royalty Stacking: A Review of the Literature 239(64)
Norman V. Siebrasse
7.1 Introduction
239(1)
7.2 Benchmark Return to Patentee
239(15)
7.2.1 A Share of the Discounted Incremental Ex Ante Value: θβν
239(1)
7.2.2 Incremental Value Over Best Alternative: ν
240(6)
7.2.3 Bargaining Power Discount: β
246(8)
7.3 Holdup
254(17)
7.3.1 Varieties of Holdup
254(17)
7.4 Mitigating Mechanisms
271(5)
7.4.1 Introduction
271(1)
7.4.2 Ex Ante Licensing
271(1)
7.4.3 Ex Ante Validity Challenge
272(1)
7.4.4 Norms
273(1)
7.4.5 Repeat Play
273(3)
7.5 Property Rules and Liability Rules
276(8)
7.5.1 Inaccuracy of Damages Awards
276(1)
7.5.2 Transaction Cost Arguments
277(1)
7.5.3 Generating Information Regarding Potential Use
277(1)
7.5.4 Inaccuracy of Damages Assessment
278(5)
7.5.5 Summary
283(1)
7.6 Holdout/Reverse Holdup
284(5)
7.6.1 General
284(3)
7.6.2 Underdetection
287(1)
7.6.3 Undercompensatory Damages
288(1)
7.6.4 Oligopoly Pricing in SSOs
289(1)
7.6.5 Summary
289(1)
7.7 Royalty Stacking
289(5)
7.7.1 Introduction
289(1)
7.7.2 Cumulative Effect of Holdup
290(1)
7.7.3 Cournot Complements
290(4)
7.8 Empirical Evidence
294(9)
7.8.1 General
294(1)
7.8.2 Case Studies
294(5)
7.8.3 Testing of Empirical Models
299(3)
7.8.4 Industry Structure
302(1)
7.8.5 Summary
302(1)
Bibliography 303(35)
Index 338
C. Bradford Biddle is Principal at Biddle Law PC and Faculty Fellow at the Center for Law, Science and Innovation, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Arizona State University (ASU). He has taught courses on technology standard setting and internet law as an Adjunct Professor at ASU and elsewhere, and was a Fellow with Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society. Jorge L. Contreras is a Professor of Law at the S. J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah. He is the editor of five books, has published more than 100 articles and book chapters, and has served on high-level advisory boards at the US National Institutes of Health, National Academies of Science and American National Standards Institute, among others. Brian J. Love is an Associate Professor of Law at School of Law, Santa Clara University, California, where he serves as Co-Director of the School's High Tech Law Institute and teaches courses in intellectual property law and remedies. Prior to joining Santa Clara, Brian was a Teaching Fellow at Stanford Law School a patent litigator, and a law clerk at several courts. Norman V. Siebrasse is a Professor of Law at the University of New Brunswick, Canada. His research focuses on pharmaceutical patent law, patent remedies and the intersection of intellectual property law and commercial law. His writing is regularly cited by the Canadian courts, including the Supreme Court of Canada. He served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada.