Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Proportionality and Facts in Constitutional Adjudication [Mīkstie vāki]

(University of Adelaide, Australia)
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 272 pages, height x width: 234x156 mm
  • Sērija : Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory
  • Izdošanas datums: 29-Jun-2023
  • Izdevniecība: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509955496
  • ISBN-13: 9781509955497
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 49,81 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Standarta cena: 58,61 €
  • Ietaupiet 15%
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
Proportionality and Facts in Constitutional AdjudicationPalielināt
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 272 pages, height x width: 234x156 mm
  • Sērija : Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory
  • Izdošanas datums: 29-Jun-2023
  • Izdevniecība: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509955496
  • ISBN-13: 9781509955497
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/9781509955497.html
Keywords:
This book uses rich proportionality jurisprudence from Australia, Germany, Canada, and South Africa to investigate the role of facts in constitutional adjudication.

Recenzijas

In sum, this book should be widely read across jurisdictions. It contributes something new in proportionality, which is hardly to be understated, and rigorously captures the nature of the field in an understudied area of practice, addressing how questions while feeding into wider debates around proportionality in Australia and beyond. * Cambridge Law Journal * It is a fine work of constitutional theory, drawing together disparate strands of leaning in epistemology and political theory in a study of real-world problem of who decides, and how they decide, questions of whether there are good enough reasons for law It is likely to be a standard reference for subsequent work on the important questions that the book lays out. * Public Law Review * Carter's book draws attention to and illuminates a crucial but overlooked aspect of constitutional adjudication. By revealing the issues of fact that are involved in the proportionality test and their implications for procedural and substantive questions, the book goes a long way towards facilitating the proper resolution of constitutional disputes A must-read. * Hong Kong Law Journal * Dr Anne Carter [ has] provided ... valuable contributions to the literature considering the role of structured proportionality in the Australian constitutional context. -- Bar News

Papildus informācija

This book uses rich proportionality jurisprudence from Australia, Germany, Canada, and South Africa to investigate the role of facts in constitutional adjudication.

1. Introduction
I. Proportionality and Facts
A. What is Proportionality?
B. Proportionality in Australia
C. Why Facts Matter
II. The Aim and Scope of this Book
III. Methodology and Comparative Context
A. Choice of Comparators
B. The Australian Constitutional Framework
C. The Comparative Context
IV. The Structure of the Book

2. The Fact-Dependent Nature of Proportionality
I. Proportionality: A Structured Approach
A. Legitimate Aim
B. Suitability
C. Necessity
D. Balancing
II. The Nature of Proportionality Reasoning
A. Types of Decisions Involved in Assessing Proportionality
B. Factual Elements in Proportionality
III. Conclusion: Proportionality and Facts

3. Understanding Facts
I. What are Facts?
II. Classifying Facts
A. Kenneth Culp Davis and the Distinction between Adjudicative Facts and Legislative Facts
B. 'Legislative Facts' and their Alternatives
C. Evaluating the Categories
III. Facts and Proportionality
A. The Suitability Stage: Purpose and Rational Connection
B. The Necessity Stage: Predictions and Counterfactuals
C. Balancing and Facts
IV. Conclusion

4. Proportionality and Facts in Comparative Perspective
I. Proportionality Compared
II. Recognising Facts?
A. The Relevance of Facts
B. Differentiating Facts: The Various Stages of Proportionality Analysis
III. Finding Facts?
A. Informing the Court
B. Deference to the Legislature
IV. Conclusion

5. Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law
I. The Australian Adoption of Proportionality
II. The Development of Proportionality
A. The Development of Different Tests
B. 'Appropriate and Adapted' versus 'Proportionality'?
C. McCloy and the Advent of Structured Proportionality
III. Evaluating Proportionality
A. Balancing
B. Levels of Scrutiny
IV. Conclusion

6. The Factual Basis of Proportionality in Australia
I. Recognising Facts
II. Facts and the Framing of Constitutional Tests
A. Reasonably Capable of Being Considered Appropriate and Adapted
B. Reasonably Appropriate and Adapted
C. Reasonably Necessary
D. Structured Proportionality
III. The Correlation between Proportionality and Facts?
IV. Conclusion

7. Procedural Implications
I. The High Court's Existing Approach: Limitations and Unresolved Issues
A. High Court Procedures and their Limitations
B. Unresolved Issues
II. Recognising Facts: Implications for Procedure
A. The Suitability Stage
B. The Necessity and Balancing Stages
III. Changing Facts and the Problem of Precedent
IV. Conclusion

8. Conclusion: Why Facts Matter

Anne Carter is Senior Lecturer at Deakin Law School, Australia.