Preface |
|
xi | |
Introduction: Objective Rules of Thought |
|
1 | (14) |
|
§1 Philosophical anti-exceptionalisin |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
§2 Pure rational thinking |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
§3 Philosophical traditionalism |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
§4 Experiential rationalism |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
§5 The intersubjective validity and objectivity of rational inquiry |
|
|
10 | (5) |
|
Part I Propositions, Fregean Sense, and Rational Modality |
|
|
|
1 A Fregean Theory of Prepositional Attitudes |
|
|
15 | (32) |
|
§1.1 Propositions as structures of concepts |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
§1.3 Use and representational content |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
§1.4 The language of thought |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
§1.5 Conclusive rational relations |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
§1.6 Trouble from the Preface Paradox? |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
§1.7 Proof and refutation |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
§1.9 An alternative theory of Fregean senses |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
§1.10 Distinguishing senses of "rational commitment" |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
§1.11 Realizing propositional attitudes |
|
|
35 | (4) |
|
§1.12 Rules and rationality |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
§1.13 Conclusive rationality and defeasibility |
|
|
42 | (5) |
|
2 A Theory of Rational Modality |
|
|
47 | (28) |
|
|
47 | (3) |
|
§2.2 Rational possibility and other family notions |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
§2.3 Rational and metaphysical entailment |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
§2.4 Coherence and rational modality |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
§2.5 Rationally possible scenarios and truth conditions |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
§2.6 Rational entailment and revision |
|
|
55 | (3) |
|
§2.7 R-Possibility, "epistemic possibility," and neo-Russellianism |
|
|
58 | (3) |
|
§2.8 The rationality version of Frege's puzzle |
|
|
61 | (4) |
|
§2.9 R-Possibility and Frege's puzzle |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
§2.10 Kripke's "A Puzzle about Belief" and Frege's puzzle |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
§2.11 David Chalmers's "epistemic possibilities" |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
§2.12 Against two-dimensionalism |
|
|
69 | (6) |
|
3 The Psychological Realization of Fregean Sense |
|
|
75 | (33) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
§3.2 Quinean revisability |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
§3.4 "Two Dogmas of Empiricism" |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
§3.5 The psychological reality of rational entailment |
|
|
81 | (5) |
|
§3.6 Our theory of psychological reality contrasted: Peacocke |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
§3.7 Our theory of psychological reality contrasted: Davidson |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
§3.8 Our theory of the psychological reality of rational entailment recapitulated |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
§3.9 General second-order inferential competencies |
|
|
90 | (3) |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
§3.11 Indeterminate rational relations |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
§3.12 Kripke and proper names |
|
|
97 | (3) |
|
§3.13 Indeterminate singular concepts |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
§3.14 Fregean sense, descriptivism, and conceptual role |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
§3.15 Non-intentional rule-following |
|
|
105 | (3) |
|
4 The Sociability of a Fregean Theory |
|
|
108 | (24) |
|
§4.1 Social anti-individualism |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
§4.2 Analyticity and social anti-individualism |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
§4.3 The publicity of propositions and concepts |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
§4.5 Deferential and non-deferential concept possession |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
§4.7 Timothy Williamson on conceptual truths |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
§4.8 Conceptual refinement |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
§4.9 Socially externalizing rationality |
|
|
121 | (4) |
|
§4.10 Prepositional attitude ascriptions and testimony |
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
§4.11 A naive neo-Russellian theory of prepositional attitude ascriptions |
|
|
128 | (4) |
|
|
132 | (29) |
|
§5.1 The minimalist explanation |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
§5.2 Inherent and essential rational relations |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
§5.3 Reductive strategies |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
§5.4 Reduction, factorization, and analysis |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
§5.5 Boghossian and concept possession |
|
|
139 | (4) |
|
§5.6 Peacocke and metasemantics |
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
§5.7 Wright, Enoch and Schechter, and pragmatism |
|
|
147 | (7) |
|
§5.8 Field and evaluativism |
|
|
154 | (7) |
|
Part II Rationality, Apriority, and Philosophy |
|
|
|
6 A Theory of the A Priori |
|
|
161 | (18) |
|
§6.1 Apriority and propositional justification |
|
|
162 | (2) |
|
§6.2 An alternative approach: Albert Casullo |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
§6.3 A priori transitions in thought |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
§6.4 Experience in a warranting role |
|
|
166 | (3) |
|
§6.5 Experience and d-justification |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
§6.6 Apriority and r-necessity |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
§6.7 Apriority and empirical indefeasibility* |
|
|
171 | (3) |
|
§6.8 Is apriority homogeneous? |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
§6.9 Is our theory of the a priori vacuous? |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
§6.10 The nature of experience |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
7 A Priori Philosophy: Responses to Objections |
|
|
179 | (19) |
|
§7.1 A posteriori knowledge of a priori faculties |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
§7.2 Limiting the challenge: Non-basic methods? |
|
|
181 | (3) |
|
§7.3 Knowledge and knowledge of knowledge |
|
|
184 | (2) |
|
§7.4 A priori reliability of a priori methods |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
§7.5 Philosophy and knowledge of philosophical abilities |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
§7.6 Thought-experiments and the quotidian |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
§7.7 Perceptual faculties in imagination |
|
|
189 | (2) |
|
§7.8 Peeking as self-experimentation? |
|
|
191 | (3) |
|
§7.9 Misleading "a priori" feelings |
|
|
194 | (4) |
|
8 The Content of Thought-Experiment Judgments |
|
|
198 | (18) |
|
§8.1 Formalizing thought-experiment arguments: Necessity? |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
§8.2 Timothy Williamson's counterfactual formulation |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
§8.3 Against the counterfactual formulation |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
§8.5 Thought-experiments as fictions |
|
|
204 | (2) |
|
§8.6 Fictions fixing content |
|
|
206 | (3) |
|
§8.7 Disanalogies between thought-experiments and fictions? |
|
|
209 | (3) |
|
§8.8 Reasoning and thought-experiments |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
§8.9 Other argumentative roles for thought-experiments |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
§8.10 Non-argumentative roles for thought-experiments |
|
|
214 | (2) |
|
9 The Epistemology of Thought-Experiment Judgments |
|
|
216 | (15) |
|
§9.1 Content and inferential competencies |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
§9.2 Reliability and knowledge about imaginary scenarios |
|
|
218 | (3) |
|
|
221 | (3) |
|
§9.4 Knowledge of necessity |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
§9.5 Categorization and apriority |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
§9.6 On conceptual analysis |
|
|
226 | (5) |
|
10 Rational Imagination and Modal Epistemology |
|
|
231 | (30) |
|
§10.1 Imagination as supposition |
|
|
232 | (2) |
|
§10.2 Imagination and possibility |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
§10.3 Coherent imagination |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
§10.4 Rational imagination |
|
|
236 | (3) |
|
§10.5 Defeasible inference in imagination |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
§10.6 R-miodality and metaphysical modality |
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
§10.7 The coherent impossible |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
§10.8 From rational to metaphysical possibility |
|
|
243 | (3) |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
§10.10 Mathematical truths |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
§10.11 A priori knowledge of rational modality |
|
|
248 | (2) |
|
|
250 | (11) |
|
Appendix A The misidentification response |
|
|
252 | (3) |
|
|
255 | (6) |
|
Part III Intuitions and Philosophy |
|
|
|
11 The Nature of Intuitions |
|
|
261 | (13) |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
§11.3 The robust picture of intuitions |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
§11.4 Williamson on phenomenology |
|
|
265 | (2) |
|
§11.5 Earlenbaugh and Molyneux |
|
|
267 | (4) |
|
§11.6 Reductionism without insignificance |
|
|
271 | (3) |
|
12 Against Strong Experiential Rationalism |
|
|
274 | (27) |
|
§12.1 Strong experiential rationalism |
|
|
275 | (2) |
|
§12.2 Intuitions and evidence |
|
|
277 | (2) |
|
§12.3 Evidence concerning the psychological |
|
|
279 | (2) |
|
§12.4 Blind irrationality |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
§12.5 What you can't see, can't rationally constrain you? |
|
|
282 | (2) |
|
§12.6 The intersubjective validity of rational norms |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
§12.7 The objectivity of rational norms |
|
|
285 | (3) |
|
§12.8 Reliabilist strong experiential rationalism |
|
|
288 | (2) |
|
§12.9 Against phenomenal conservatism |
|
|
290 | (4) |
|
§12.10 Against general foundationalism |
|
|
294 | (1) |
|
§12.11 Against subjective foundationalism |
|
|
295 | (2) |
|
§12.12 Intuitions and evidence revisited |
|
|
297 | (2) |
|
§12.13 Intuitions and purely rational inquiry |
|
|
299 | (2) |
|
13 Intuition as a Source of Evidence? |
|
|
301 | (18) |
|
|
301 | (2) |
|
§13.2 Blind irrationality reconsidered |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
§13.3 Epistemology and psychology |
|
|
304 | (3) |
|
§13.4 Apriority and the "New Evil Demon" problem |
|
|
307 | (2) |
|
§13.5 Perceptual justification and the Problem of the Speckled Hen |
|
|
309 | (3) |
|
§13.6 Failure of justified belief |
|
|
312 | (2) |
|
§13.7 Intuiting and perceiving compared |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
§13.8 Intuiting and perceiving contrasted |
|
|
315 | (2) |
|
§13.9 The Benacerraf-Field challenge |
|
|
317 | (2) |
|
14 Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Methodology |
|
|
319 | (16) |
|
§14.1 Positive experimental philosophy |
|
|
319 | (3) |
|
§14.2 Negative experimental philosophy |
|
|
322 | (2) |
|
§14.3 The use of intuitions in philosophy |
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
§14.4 The critique generalized? |
|
|
325 | (4) |
|
§14.5 Epistemology and methodology |
|
|
329 | (1) |
|
§14.6 Traditional methodology and experimental philosophy |
|
|
330 | (2) |
|
§14.7 Philosophy and the quotidian |
|
|
332 | (3) |
References |
|
335 | (16) |
Index |
|
351 | |