Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Saving the International Justice Regime: Beyond Backlash against International Courts [Hardback]

5.00/5 (1 ratings by Goodreads)
(University of Nebraska, Lincoln)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 200 pages, height x width x depth: 235x158x20 mm, weight: 530 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Izdošanas datums: 30-Sep-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1316511413
  • ISBN-13: 9781316511411
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 91,13 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
Saving the International Justice Regime: Beyond Backlash against International CourtsPalielināt
  • Formāts: Hardback, 200 pages, height x width x depth: 235x158x20 mm, weight: 530 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Izdošanas datums: 30-Sep-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1316511413
  • ISBN-13: 9781316511411
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/9781316511411.html
Keywords:
"In 2016, Burundi, The Gambia and South Africa all made moves to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC). They were not alone. Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda and a number of other African Union (AU) member states sought to orchestrate a mass withdrawal from the ICC. This withdrawal was precipitated by the ICC's casework in Africa, including indictments against Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta and Deputy President William Ruto, as well as former Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir. While mass withdrawal never came to pass, the damage that these sustained rhetorical and political attacks caused continues to reverberate around the international criminal justice sphere. Indeed, efforts to undermine and assail the ICC are not unique to African Union member states. In 2019, the ICC inched closer to opening a case against the president of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte. President Duterte had some choice words to express his discontent with international justice: "I will never, never, never answer any question coming from you. It's bullshit to me. I am only responsible to the Filipino[ s]. Filipinos will judge." The Philippines went on to become only the second country ever to withdraw from the ICC."--

Papildus informācija

This book provides a framework for understanding backlash against the international justice regime and how to save it.
List of Tables x
Acknowledgments xi
List of Abbreviations xii
Legal Cases xiv
Resolutions, Statutes, and Treaties xix
1 Progress and Pushback in the Judicialization of Human Rights an Introduction 1(34)
Resistance, Resentment, and Retrenchment in Global Politics
6(1)
How International Human Rights and Criminal Tribunals Work: Authority in Context
7(11)
Defining Backlash
18(6)
Operationalizing Backlash: Extraordinary and Ordinary Politics
24(8)
Roadmap to the Book
32(3)
2 Backlash in Theoretical Context 35(27)
Introduction
35(3)
Dependence on States and the Courts' Susceptibility to Subversion
38(3)
Normative Discontent: Debating Human Rights Norms
41(7)
International Courts, Domestic Consequences
48(5)
Blinding the Watchdog: Anticipating Future Violence
53(2)
Backlash, but Which Form?
55(2)
Methodological Approach and Case Selection
57(4)
Conclusion
61(1)
3 The Politics of Withdrawal 62(26)
Introduction
62(1)
Explaining Withdrawals from International Human Rights and Criminal Courts
63(2)
Mapping the Scope of Withdrawal
65(2)
Case Selection and Empirical Approach
67(2)
Case 1: Peru and the (Mostly) Realized Withdrawal
69(8)
Case 2: Venezuela's Realized Withdrawal(s)
77(7)
Case 3: Colombia's Different Path
84(2)
Conclusion
86(2)
4 Replacing the International Justice Regime 88(24)
Introduction
88(1)
Why Alternative Justice Mechanisms as a Form of Backlash?
89(3)
Case Selection and Empirical Approach
92(1)
Case 1: The African Union's Plan for the ICC
93(14)
Case 2: The Latin American Experience
107(4)
Conclusion
111(1)
5 Bureaucrats, Budgets, and Backlash: Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts 112(21)
Introduction
112(1)
Budgets and Bureaucracies as Sites of Backlash
113(3)
Case Selection and Empirical Approach
116(1)
Case 1: Reforms and Restrictions as a Canary in the Coal Mine for the IAHRS
117(7)
Case 2: Political Crises and Bureaucratic and Budgetary Conflicts at the ICC
124(7)
Conclusion
131(2)
6 Doctrinal Challenges: Diluting the Domestic Impacts of International Adjudication 133(25)
Introduction
133(1)
From Whence Doctrinal Challenges?
134(2)
Regional Courts, the Margin of Appreciation, and the Concept of Subsidiarity
136(2)
Case Selection and Empirical Approach
138(1)
Case 1s Russia, the ECtHR, and Protocol 14 of the ECHR
139(12)
Case 2: Domestic Dramas, International Reforms, and ECtHR Supporter States
151(5)
Conclusion
156(2)
7 How to Save the International Justice Regime 158(25)
Introduction
158(1)
How to Save the International Justice Regime
159(18)
Review of the Main Argument and Pathways for Future Research
177(4)
Law Is Preferable to War: Save the International Justice Regime!
181(2)
Appendix 183(4)
Select Bibliography 187(41)
Index 228
Courtney Hillebrecht is the Samuel Clark Waugh Distinguished Professor of International Relations and an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. She is the author of Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance (Cambridge University Press, 2014).