Foreword |
|
xii | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xviii | |
|
|
xx | |
|
|
1 | (5) |
|
2 Selective reproduction: ethics and the law |
|
|
6 | (34) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (5) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (7) |
|
2.4.1 Risks of ART and embryo biopsy |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 Risks associated with particular types of selection |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
2.4.3 Better to be born than not |
|
|
17 | (3) |
|
2.5 Case study: saviour siblings |
|
|
20 | (6) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
21 | (4) |
|
2.5.3 Lessons from the UK and Australia |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.6 A relational approach to the welfare of the child |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
|
29 | (11) |
|
3 The welfare of the child to be born |
|
|
40 | (31) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
3.2 Welfare of the child in ART regulation |
|
|
41 | (10) |
|
3.2.1 Origins of the welfare of the child provision in ART legislation |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Review of the welfare of the child provision in the UK |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Review of HFEA policy on the welfare of the child |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
3.2.4 Review of ART regulation in Victoria -- a missed opportunity |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
3.2.5 Should the welfare of the child principle be retained in ART law? |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
3.3 Interests of future persons |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
3.3.1 The future child as a `hypothetical person' |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Likely foreseeable or generic interests of the future child |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (4) |
|
3.4.1 Parental motivation for using PGD |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
3.4.2 Parental love once the child is born |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (6) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.5.2 Psychological and social harm |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
3.5.3 Psychological and social benefits |
|
|
59 | (3) |
|
|
62 | (9) |
|
4 A relational approach to the welfare of the child |
|
|
71 | (25) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
4.2 Families and human flourishing |
|
|
72 | (5) |
|
4.2.1 Nature of intimate family |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
4.2.2 Role of families in promoting human flourishing |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
4.3 Saviour siblings and collective family interests |
|
|
77 | (4) |
|
4.3.1 A shared family journey |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
4.3.2 Are collective interests legitimate? |
|
|
78 | (3) |
|
4.4 Compromise within families |
|
|
81 | (9) |
|
4.4.1 Familial duty as a justification for individual compromise |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 Membership as a foundation for moral responsibility |
|
|
83 | (4) |
|
4.4.3 Higher duty to family than strangers |
|
|
87 | (3) |
|
|
90 | (6) |
|
5 A relational model for selective reproduction |
|
|
96 | (33) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
5.2 General family decision-making |
|
|
97 | (5) |
|
5.2.1 Parental duty and discretion |
|
|
97 | (3) |
|
5.2.2 Impact of familial character on family decision-making |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
5.3 Necessary compromise and unacceptable sacrifice |
|
|
102 | (7) |
|
5.3.1 Limiting state involvement in family decision-making |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
5.3.2 Respecting the child as an individual |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
5.3.3 Protecting the child from harm |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
5.4 Role of families in medical decision-making |
|
|
109 | (6) |
|
5.4.1 Position of the child to be born is analogous to that of a patient |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
5.4.2 Medical decision-making involving families |
|
|
111 | (4) |
|
5.5 A relational model for selective reproduction |
|
|
115 | (7) |
|
5.5.1 Shift in focus from child to be born to family as a whole |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
5.5.2 Modified collaborative decision-making process |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
5.5.3 General features of a relational model for selective reproduction |
|
|
117 | (5) |
|
|
122 | (7) |
|
6 Regulating saviour sibling selection |
|
|
129 | (29) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
6.2 Should we regulate selective reproduction? |
|
|
129 | (6) |
|
6.2.1 Regulating assisted reproduction |
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
6.2.2 Regulating selective reproduction |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
6.2.3 Welfare of the child principle |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
6.3 A relational framework for regulating saviour sibling selection |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
6.3.1 Different regulatory models |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
6.32 Clinical ethics consultation |
|
|
138 | (9) |
|
6.3.3 Outline of regulatory framework |
|
|
140 | (7) |
|
6.4 Differences from UK and Australian regulation |
|
|
147 | (3) |
|
|
150 | (8) |
|
|
158 | (8) |
Bibliography |
|
166 | (15) |
Index |
|
181 | |