|
|
v | |
|
|
xi | |
Perchance to Dream: Well Integrated Public and Private Antitrust Enforcement in the European Union |
|
xiii | |
|
|
PART I DESIGNING A BALANCED SYSTEM: DAMAGES, DETERRENCE, LENIENCY AND LITIGANTS' RIGHTS |
|
|
1 | (82) |
|
I Designing Private Rights of Action for Competition Policy Systems: The Role of Interdependence and the Advantages of a Sequential Approach |
|
|
3 | (14) |
|
|
II Designing a Balanced System: Damages, Deterrence, Leniency and Litigants' Rights |
|
|
17 | (10) |
|
|
III Designing a Balanced System: Damages, Deterrence, Leniency and Litigants' Rights -- A Claimant's Perspective |
|
|
27 | (14) |
|
|
|
IV Trying to Use Criminal Law and Incarceration to Punish Participants and Deter Cartels Raises Some Broad Political and Social Questions in Europe |
|
|
41 | (22) |
|
|
V Competition Compliance: Fines and Complementary Incentives |
|
|
63 | (20) |
|
|
|
PART II INTEGRATING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT IN EUROPE: LEGAL AND JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES |
|
|
83 | (94) |
|
I Promoting Private Antitrust Enforcement: Remember Article 102 |
|
|
85 | (10) |
|
|
II Integrating Public and Private Enforcement in Europe: Legal and Jurisdictional Issues -- The German Perspective |
|
|
95 | (14) |
|
|
|
III Integrating Public and Private Enforcement in Europe: Legal Issues |
|
|
109 | (32) |
|
|
IV The Relationship between Public and Private Enforcement: quod Dei Deo, quod Caesaris Caesari |
|
|
141 | (18) |
|
|
V US Antitrust Arbitration |
|
|
159 | (18) |
|
|
|
PART III OPTIONS FOR COLLECTIVE REDRESS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION |
|
|
177 | (92) |
|
I Designing a Private Remedies System for Antitrust Cases -- Lessons Learned from the U.S. Experience |
|
|
179 | (16) |
|
|
II Collective Redress: Perspectives from the US Experience |
|
|
195 | (10) |
|
|
III Collective Redress for Cartel Damages in Canada |
|
|
205 | (30) |
|
|
|
IV Options for Collective Redress in the EU |
|
|
235 | (22) |
|
|
V The Future of Collective Damages Actions in Europe |
|
|
257 | (12) |
|
|
PART IV DRAWING LESSONS AND CONCLUSIONS |
|
|
269 | (70) |
|
I Integrating Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law: Implications for Courts and Agencies |
|
|
271 | (24) |
|
|
II Market Forces and Private Enforcement: A Start But Some Way Still to Go |
|
|
295 | (20) |
|
|
|
III Integrating Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law: Implications for Courts and Agencies |
|
|
315 | (12) |
|
|
IV Integrating Public and Private Enforcement in Europe: Issues for Courts |
|
|
327 | (8) |
|
|
|
335 | (4) |
|
|
PART V PRIVATE DAMAGES CLAIMS AND THE ELUSIVE FUTURE |
|
|
339 | (38) |
|
I The `Right to Damages' in a `System of Parallel Competences': A Fresh Look at BRT v SABAM and its Subsequent Interpretation |
|
|
341 | (36) |
|
|
|
|
Annex I Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union (2013) |
|
|
377 | (44) |
|
Annex II Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Report: Damages actions for breach of the EU antitrust rules (2013) |
|
|
421 | (90) |
|
Annex III Proposal for a Council Directive on rules governing damages actions for infringements of Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (2009) |
|
|
511 | (26) |
References |
|
537 | (10) |
Table of cases |
|
547 | |